My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-22-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
10-22-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2025 11:17:13 AM
Creation date
2/10/2025 11:15:22 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
448
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 8, 1990 <br />LAFAYETTE RIDGE CONTINUED <br />1978, a private street was made, however in the 1980 <br />Comprehensive Plan it said that anything in the urban area, of <br />which this was part, should be public streets. As far as the <br />hardcover credit, m.ost of the properties in Orono are outside of <br />1000' but there are substantial wetlands. This credit could <br />allow them to put hardcover on almost the entire lot because they <br />are in a 35% zone. The City's lot coverage zone may govern this <br />and may not make any difference. <br />JoEllen Hurr spoke representing the people of Lafa>ccte <br />Ridge. They requested action at this meeting rather than <br />tabling. <br />Bernhardson referred to the listing of private streets. <br />John Gerhardson noted the streets that were private within the <br />urban zone including Casco Cove, Church Lane, Herrick Circle, <br />Maple Avenue, Pence Lane, Sugarwoods Dr. and Lafayette Ridge Ct. <br />The only three meeting the City standards are Sugarwoods, <br />Lafayette and Herrick Circle. <br />Acting Mayor Callahan referred to the Urban Transportation <br />Policies, Secti n 2 noting that it doesn't really say there must <br />be a public roa- He asked the residents in attendance what they <br />want to do this for. <br />They felt it was in their interest to have the street taken <br />over by the City because they pay the same taxes as the rest of <br />the constituents. They have successfully done this with the City <br />of Minnetonka Beach and are requesting the same consideration. <br />Callahan asked if they felt it would be cheaper for the City <br />to take it over. <br />Bernhardson clarified that as private streets they are <br />responsible for snow removal, repair maintenance, etc. In a <br />public street, the City would be doing this work except possibly <br />for a major reconstruction. This area would probably not <br />necessitate that for a long time to come as it is up to City <br />standards. <br />Goetten stated this type of situation needs to be studied <br />carefully and approved. There are other streets within Orono <br />that may have similar requests. <br />Nettles asked how long this street was. Since this is just <br />a cul-du-sac it is not significant in cost cr City duties. <br />Callahan states the Comprehensive Plan did not take the same <br />view of public streets and PUD's and that may be of significance. <br />He asked if all or some of the private roads are through PUD's. <br />The answer will be found out.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.