My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-08-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
10-08-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/3/2025 2:40:27 PM
Creation date
2/3/2025 2:38:02 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
564
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 21, 1990 <br />ZONING FILE #1535-FAFINSKI CONTINUED <br />It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Bellows, to recommena <br />anoroval of the subdivision of a lot line rearrangement for the <br />property owners of 3765 and 3745 Watertown Road, subject to the <br />combination of the triangu] ir parcels with the larger tracts as <br />shown on the survey. Motion, Ayes-6, Nays-0. Motion passed. <br />#1502 MICHAEL HILBELINK <br />2180 PROSPECT AVENUE <br />VARIANCE <br />REFERRED BACK TO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Mr. Hilbelink was present, as was Mr. and Mrs. Jentilucci <br />and their Attorney, Neil Heikkila. <br />Mabusth briefly reviewed the history of this property and <br />informed the Planning Commission of the current inrormation <br />regarding this application. <br />Hanson noted that the side setback for a corner lot is 50'. <br />He-ever, he would accept a 20' variance in this case. <br />Bellows and Kelley indicated that they agreed with Hanson. <br />Bellows suggested that a two-srory structure may be more <br />suitable for this lot than the plan p oposec. <br />Mr Heikkila reminded the Planning Commission that the <br />proposed structure for this lot would not be located where tne <br />pre-existino structure stood. He statea that the location or the <br />proposed residence has been recently fillea a.nd remains in <br />disturbed state. Mr. Heikkila questioned whether it was Mr. <br />Hilbelink's intention to construct the house for wnicn he is <br />showing a plan. He concurred with Bellows that another house <br />plan may be more suitable than the ranch-style being proposea. <br />Mabusth informed Mr. Heikkila that the City Building <br />Inspectors will determine whether the ground conditions <br />allow the structure to be constructed in the location proposed. <br />Mr. Heikkila stated that his clients are still concerned <br />about the potential for their property to flood as a result of <br />Mr Hilbelink's proposal. Mr. Heikkila presented photographs of <br />Mr. HiJbelink's property. The photos showed the area before ana <br />after the storm sewer was installed. <br />Kelley asked Mabusth how the drainage issue will be handled. <br />Mabusth understood that Jentiluccis and Mr. Hilbelink will <br />grant a drainace easement to the City over their portions of the <br />drainageway. The City would now be responsible for the <br />drainageway. <br />- 7 -
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.