My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-08-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
10-08-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/3/2025 2:40:27 PM
Creation date
2/3/2025 2:38:02 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
564
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD MAY 21, 1990 <br />ZONING FILE #1532-FULLERTON ^ <br />previously expressed concern regarding the dedication of an <br />additional 7' of right-of-way. Mabusth stated that it was first <br />hhnnaht that the riqht-of-way could be taken from the west side <br />of Willow at the t "me County Road 116 was installed. She saxd <br />that since that project is no longer scheduled to occur, <br />alternatives have been discussed. Mabusth stated that sne had <br />asked the City Administrator if the 7' could be dedicatee from <br />the east side now, with the condition that it be vacatea ^nould <br />County Road 116 be constructed. Mabusth said that only the 7 <br />right-of-way along Lot 1, Block 1, would be retained by the City <br />due to the^ potential of a traffic signal being placed at the <br />intersection. <br />Mr. Cox stated that he objected to dedicating 7' of his <br />nropertv to the City. He did not understand why the Ci.y <br />oreferred to disturb the existing trees anu landscaping on the <br />east side of Willow. .Mr. Cox said t.hat there is nothing on ..... <br />west side. <br />There were no further comments from the public regarding <br />this matter and the public hearing was to be continued. <br />KeUev c'ked Gaffron whether iz may be necessary to have the <br />Planning Commission review anything further with regar- to the <br />septic sites. <br />Gaffron replied that it would only be necessary if it became <br />necessary to move lot lines to accommodate septic areas. <br />Bellows believed it would be necessary to table this matter <br />due to the revision of the lot line between Lots 6 an- / in <br />addition to the other issues yet to be resolvea. <br />It was moved by Hanson, seconded by Bellows, to table this <br />application. Motion, Ayes-5, Cohen, Nay. Motion passed. <br />11535 TIMOTHY W. FAFINSKI <br />3765 WATERTOWN ROAD <br />PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION <br />PUBLIC HEARING 9:00 P.M. TO i..J5 P.M. for <br />Mr. Timothy Fafinski and Mr. Larry Cook, the Contract <br />Deed owner of 3765 Watertown Road, were present. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were <br />duly noted. <br />Gaffron explained the pertinent facts involved with this <br />application to the Planning Commission. <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this matter <br />and the public hearing was closed. <br />- 6 -
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.