Laserfiche WebLink
iJu w u J <br />Additional policv guidelines will be addressed at the next <br />coiTuHission meeting for recommendations to be sent to the City <br />Council. <br />5. BEDERWOOD PARK PROPOSAL. <br />There was neyy a discussion about the Bederwood Park proposal, <br />which was discussed at th last meeting. It basically relates to a <br />plan dated July 27, 1990 prepared by Earl F. Anaerson & Associates. <br />Because of the absence of three members, it was aecided to defer <br />any final action on this until the next meeting. <br />All the commission members appeared to generally favor this <br />proposal, and were impressed with t: a detail and initiative taken <br />bv the neighbors in coming up witn a plan such as this. Ms. _ <br />Scherokee Use was also there with some comments concerning uheir <br />desire to complete this project. Mr. Gerhardson mentioned that it <br />might be best to present this in snages on a priority basis. ^ <br />Accordingly, the Bederwood park proposal will oe taxen up at uhe <br />next commission meeting. Mr. Gerhardson also rr.entionec tnat there <br />mioht be so.-..e charitable contributions available tnrougn the Lions <br />Club, which might want to donate some money to help build part of <br />this- <br />6. FULLERTON DEVELOPMENT. <br />The Fullerton development was then discussed. Chairman Dick <br />Flint mentioned that he had talked about some of the concerns <br />expressed by the developer with city staff and with tne developer. <br />The developer has evidently withdrawn his request to seek city <br />indemnification to have a green buffer zone there, and the only <br />issue remaining was the timing issue. The developer still wanted <br />to not have anyt hing developec for these bike trails ^ two-year <br />period. The developer suggested a compromise that tne bike trail <br />and path would not be built until it could be hooked up with some <br />continuing bike trails throughout the city. <br />It was then discussed by the commission and the commission did <br />not want the developer have a delay built into the easement nego <br />tiations. There was some concern that this might be lost in the <br />shuffle if it was not done during the planning stages now, ana <br />tie it to something that might not ever happen ne^r that area would <br />make it a useless benefit that the city had obta. led. Accordingly, <br />Mr. Flint was instructed to oppose any delays in implementing this <br />plan, but to take due consideration for working around any septic <br />system problems that might exist, as a practical basis. Mr. Flint <br />is going to be appearing at the City Council meeting on Monday to <br />express our opinions.