My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-08-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1990-1996 Microfilm
>
1990
>
10-08-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/3/2025 2:40:27 PM
Creation date
2/3/2025 2:38:02 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
564
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
A RESOLUTION GRANTING <br />A CONDTIONAL USB PERMIT <br />PER MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE <br />SECTION 10.50, SUBDIVISION 3 (A)7 <br />FILE #1590 <br />WHEREAS, Minnegasco, Inc. (hereinafter "the applicant") has <br />an interest in the property located at 530 Old Crystal Bay Road North <br />located within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally <br />described as Lot 1, Bloc)c 1, Van Dale Addition, Hennepin County, <br />Minnesota, (hereinafter "property"), and <br />WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for <br />a Conditional Use Permit per Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.50, <br />Subdivision 3 (A)7 to permit the temporary use of a portable liquid <br />natural gas vaporizer. <br />Minnesota: <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, <br />FINDINGS <br />1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1590, <br />2. The property is located in the Industrial Zoning District. <br />3. On September 17, 1990 the Orono Planning Commission reviewed <br />the application as proposed and recommended approval based upon <br />the following findings: <br />a) Proposed location of this use within the City's <br />industrial par)c meets the objectives of the zoning chapter <br />and purposes of the industrial district in which the use is <br />located. <br />b) The proposed use was found to not be detr^;mental to the <br />public health, safety or general welfare or materially <br />injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity and <br />will not have a negative impact on the surrounding <br />residential properties because of its limited period of <br />operation within the year. <br />Page 1 of 4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.