Laserfiche WebLink
#2341 - Dan Anderson <br />March 20,1998 <br />Page 3 <br />Potential for Municipal Sewer <br />At a work session on March 12 Council advised staff that there is Council support for developing <br />this property with municipal sewer rather than with septic systems, w ith the stipulation that only as <br />many lots as could be developed with septic systems will be allowed for this property. Applicant <br />was advised of this on March 19 and was generally in favor of such a scheme. Applicant did have <br />concerns about the timing, as well as the mechanics (who will design it and build it, who will ovm <br />it, how will it be paid for, etc.). He would prefer that it be assessed to each benefitting lot over some <br />time period. Staff has not yet formulated any recommendation on this topic, but has initiated contact <br />with Met Council as to the timing and process for a MUSA amendment. It is possible that a MUSA <br />amendment will take some months to procure, and applicant is hoping to have road construction <br />happening in June... <br />Tree and Woodland Impacts <br />Council on March 6 requested thai applicant rope off the proposed tree preservation easement <br />boundary for staff and council to view. Staff walked the site on March 19 with applicant, and staffs <br />vision of the area to be protected varies somew hat from that of applicant. The boundary was located <br />along the lake side of the old field road wandering parallel to the shoreline, below the top of the bluff <br />and lakeward of the eastward extent of tree line. Staff would rather have seen the boundary along <br />the fence line w-est of the field road. <br />It is imperative that Council view this proposed boundary in person to reach a conclusion whether <br />it appropriately placed. Staff has not made any revisions to the proposed easement document <br />language, and that is a topic for discussion. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Council should discuss each of the topics listed below, and any other issues you feel are outstanding: <br />1. Stormwater plan <br />2. Layout/variances for Lot 7 <br />3. Trail location and construction <br />4. Sewer possibility <br />5. Tree preservation boundary <br />Staff again recommends that the applicant be given conceptual direction, and that no preliminary plat <br />approval be granted until the stormwater issues have been resolved and final lot lines established, <br />and any other issues adequately addressed. <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br />Give applicant conceptual direction on issues of note, and table the application.