My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-23-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
03-23-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2025 12:32:39 PM
Creation date
1/14/2025 12:30:37 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
516
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
#2326 - B-5 Amendment <br />March 19, 1998 <br />Page 3 <br />Other Possible Limitations <br />Staff has not had a chance to investigate the potential methods for limiting the kitchen facilities, <br />methods of food preparation or packaging, range of products offered, or other factors involved with <br />the restaurant business that might be used as limitations. Most zoning codes vve have revievved don t <br />get into such details, although e.xamples likely can be found. <br />Goal: Regulate Impacts Rather Than Products <br />It still is staffs opinion that we should concentrate on regulating the impacts a business or category <br />of businesses have on the surrounding area, rather than dictating what products or services are <br />provided or how they are provided. Creating classes of restaurants of varying levels of impact in <br />regard to parking, traffic, noise, lighting, odors, litter generation, demands on public services, etc. <br />will provide a more solid basis for allowing one specific use but not another. Under our current <br />'specific listing' method of allowed uses, it is difficult to define those characteristics of similar uses <br />that differentiate one from another in regards to impacts. How is the impact of a Subway any <br />different than that of a Bagel Shop? Why should we allow one but not the other? <br />Ultimately, as Council has noted, we need to revamp the Business District code sections; not only <br />to update them to reflect the current state of commerce, but to make it easier to deal with the vast <br />variety of contemporary business uses while being sensitive to their probable close proximity to <br />residential uses. This will take a thoughtful process, one which stall has not really had an <br />opportunity to commence. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />The attached ordinance adds 'ci ffee and bagel retail stores' to the list of B-5 conditional uses, which <br />gives the council ability to establish additional appropriate conditions when a CUP for a given <br />location is applied for. Such uses would, of course, have to comply with all lighting, signage, <br />parking, and other standards of the B-5 District. Given Council's intent to further limit the expansion <br />of such use into sometliing of greater impact, staff recommends a fourth CUP condition (in addition <br />to the three previously suggested) that will specifically regulate seating for the 'coffee and bagel <br />retail store use'. If Council wishes to delve more deeply into other possible limitations on this <br />specific use, that will take some time. <br />The four specific conditions proposed for the 'coffee and bagel retail stores' conditional use are as <br />follows: <br />a. No more than 50% of the gross floor area of any single building shall be devoted to <br />coffee and/or bagel retail store uses.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.