Laserfiche WebLink
#2326 - B-5 Amendment <br />March 19, 1998 <br />Page 2 <br />Range of Products and Ser\ ices <br />As discussed at the March 9 meeting, both coffee and bagel retail stores, as contemplated by staff <br />and the applicant and as commonly exist today, will provide a variety of related products. Coffee <br />shop will likely serve some sort of food, muffins, cookies, etc. along with coffee and possibly other <br />drinks. A bagel shop will likely have juices, soft drinks, and bagel based sandwiches, chips, dessert <br />items, etc. Both will function as a 'convenience' type restaurant where food is obtained by the <br />customer at a counter, likely w ithout waitserv ice. Both will provide some amount of seating, and <br />will expect a portion of their customers to 'eat in' while others 'grab and go'. <br />Parking Not Necessarily a Limiting Factor <br />The amount of parking on the applicant's site, for e.xample, is 62 stalls, apportioned as follows: <br />Bank and Office (5200 net sf; 1 stall reqd. per 200 sf): 26 stalls <br />Retail (4500 net sf; 1 stall reqd. per 150 sf): 30 stalls <br />Extra stalls provided 6 stalls <br />Total 62 staha <br />If the maximum allowable retail space is devoted to a resinurant use (4000 gross sf), with a net <br />public floor area of 60% or 2400 sf, our code (1 slall:80 sf) would require 30 stalls, which at a 3:1 <br />ratio (see below) translates to 90 seats. Therefore, parking is not going to limit the seating in and <br />of itself. <br />Seating as a Limiting Factor <br />Please see Exhibit A, which briefly compares various restaurant uses w ith their seating needs. Fast <br />food restaurants typically require 75-100 seats. Family sit-down chain restaurants are typically in <br />the 150 seat range. Bagel and coffee shops are somewhere in the 25-45 seat range individually, or <br />30-65 seats as a combined use. <br />A standard parking-to-seating ratio for restaurants is 1 stall per 3 seats, although fast food restaurants <br />typically are at 1:1.2 or 1:1.5 due to the nature of their high lunch-hour traffic. <br />If the Council's goal is to limit the restaurant uses to those which are low traffic generators, limiting <br />the seating to, say 45 seats for an individual coffee/bagel use or 60 seats for a combined use, would <br />likely make the location less attractive to the typical fast food or family restaurant chain users.