My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 5515
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 5500 - 5599 (August 28, 2006 -April 7, 2007)
>
Resolution 5515
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2018 3:06:58 PM
Creation date
11/5/2015 11:30:23 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. �o� <br /> . <br /> o � <br /> • -� � C ITY of ORONO <br /> � - ;.. � <br /> , ti <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ti . <br /> ��`�kEsi;og'�G NO. 5 5 1 5 . <br /> a. The lot is significantly substandard in axea and width and the existing <br /> structure and hardcover on the lot are nonconforming. The property is served <br /> with municipal sewer. A residence has existed on the property for many <br /> years. <br /> � b. There is no additional land available to bring the lot width or lot area into <br /> conformity. <br /> c. The proposed structure complies with side yard and average lakeshore setback <br /> requirements. <br /> d. A single family residence has existed on the property for many years. <br /> e. Because the property has less than 10,000 s.f. in area it is allowed a 1,500 s.f. <br /> structural footprint absent other factors. The applicant has proposed a 1,223 <br /> � s.f. home. f <br /> f. The applicant has proposed a minimal driveway, walk, and patio in order to <br /> limit the magnitude of the hardcover excesses. . <br /> g. The size of the proposed residence and magnitude of hardcover variance is <br /> consistent with other approved development in the neighborhood. <br /> 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by <br /> the applicant and the public, and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, <br /> safety and welfare of the community. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to <br /> it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting <br /> the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire <br /> hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a <br /> convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship <br /> or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; <br /> and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and <br /> Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> � <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.