My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-23-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1997-1999
>
1998
>
11-23-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2025 10:31:07 AM
Creation date
1/7/2025 10:19:40 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
594
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 9,1998 <br />(#12) EXTEND MORATORIUM ON DWELLING UNIT DENSITY CREDIT IN LR-lC-1 <br />DISTRICT - ORDINANCE NO. 180, 2ND SERIES. <br />Gaffion explained the ordinance was adopted May 11, 1998 to establish a moratorium for 190 days <br />on the granting of applications that use the 50% increase in dwelling unit density in the LR-lC-1 <br />zone which is basically a few properties in the Navarre area. The moratorium expires November <br />16 and it is recommended that it be extended for an additional 180 days because the study has not <br />been completed. <br />Goetten moved, Peterson seconded, to adopt Ordinance No. 180, 2nd Series extending the <br />moratorium established in Ordinance #175, 2nd Series. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />(#10) COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL PARK FEE - ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE <br />Gaffron explained in April 1998 Council adopted a new park dedication ordinance tnat established <br />a maximum and minimum park fee which is used whenever the City decides to accept a fee rather <br />than land in residential situations. Commercial property needs to be dealt with in a different manner <br />to establish a connection between the impact that commercial property has on the park system. The <br />City by Resolution No. 4067 established that 10 employees are equivalent to one dwelling unit. The <br />problem in defining 10 employees is that at the time of subdivision it is not always known how that <br />property might be developed or used. An office use would have a different population of employees <br />than a retail use. The ordinance does not establish a method for determining how many employees <br />to use for calculation purposes. Some of the ways suggested for making a determination is through <br />the parking requirements, an acreage basis, highest use basis or a combination. <br />Moorse noted that other cities use a basic percentage of property value in determining the park <br />dedication fee. <br />Flint said using the 50 employee determination calculated too high and felt 30 employees an acre <br />for this kind of usage would be more appropriate. He suggested collecting the fee at the time a <br />building permit would be issued. <br />Kelley stated it would he better to collect the park fee at the time of subdivision. <br />Moorse suggested using a percentage showing a connection between the park usage and employees. <br />After discussion, it was decided that staff reexamine the methods for determining commercial park <br />fees by either using 25-30 employees an acre or a basic percentage of value. <br />8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.