Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 21, 1998 <br />(^2401 Thomas and Margaret Radke, continued) <br />Stoddard recommended limiting the size of the storage shed to 140 square feet. <br />Berg stated she concurred with Stoddard. <br />Stoddard moved, Lindquist seconded, to approve Application /f2401, 3424 East Lake Street, <br />granting of a variance to construct an accessory structure on Outlot B, the size of the <br />structure to be limited to 140 square feet, per the concept plan submitted by the Applicants. <br />VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 2, McMillan and Smith opposed. <br />(«3) ttZAOZ TERRY CLARK, 1575 LONG LAKE BOULEVARD - VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL <br />USE PERMIT, 6:52 p.m. - 7:08 p.m. <br />Terry Clark and Architect Neil Weber were present <br />Van Zomeren stated the applicant is requesting variances for street yard setback, hardcover in the <br />0-75’ setback, bluff setback, lakeshore setback, as well as a top of bluff setback variance. A <br />conditional use permit is also required to alter the land in the 0-75* setback. <br />The Applicant has submitted s revised proposal that v/ould raise the existing residence four feet '.o <br />allow for a walkout lower level, which would change the grade on the south side of the structure. <br />This is a solution that has been reached in an effort to reduce the impact on the lake side of the <br />property, and v/ou!d add an additional 159 square feet in hardcover. <br />Weber slated the 0-75* setback will be affected no matter what design is proposed since the <br />residence lies in the zone. Weber stated the current proposal is an effort to minimize the impact to <br />the 0-75* zone as much as possible by raising the house up to add a walkout under a new deck on <br />the lakeside of the residence. <br />Chair Smith opened the hearing up for public comment <br />A resident of the area inquired about the impact the excavation would have on the adjoining <br />properties, noting he has had standing v/ater on his properly in the past. <br />Weber staled there will be very little excavation done except for the footings and under the deck. <br />Van Zomeren stated City Staff is aware of the resident s concerns and has requested the City <br />Engineer to review the plans. Van Zomeren stated the neighbor’s current water problems are not <br />related to this application and would need to be addressed separately. <br />Chair Smith commented it is the Planning Commission’s philosphy not to approve applications <br />that would adversely affect the adjoining properties, noting the City Engineer feels it will not have a <br />negative impact on the neighboring properties. <br />Van Zomeren stated the ground elevations and amount of fill still need to be calculated. <br />Stoddard commented he is in favor of the plan <br />Lindquist stated the Applicants have complied with v/hat the Planning Commission had requested at <br />the prior hearing, noting the ordinances governing hardcover v ere passed after the house was built. <br />McMillan staled she is concerned about major excavation in the 0-75* setback, noting this application <br />Page 3