Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File ~2105 <br />February 8, 1996 <br />Page 3 <br />List of Exhibits for Current Application <br />A - Application <br />A-1 Addendum <br />B - Plat Map <br />C - Certificate of Mailing and Property OwTiers' List <br />D - Resolution No. 3540 <br />E - Orono Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 2/22/995 <br />F - Orono Council Meeting Minutes 3/13/95 <br />G - DNR Letter 3/20/95 <br />H - Reduced Surv ey Not to Scale <br />Exhibits from Application #1997 <br />D - Description of Request <br />E - Hardcover Statement <br />F - Unique Property Conditions <br />I - Adjacent Neighbors' Acknowledgement Forms <br />J - Hardcover 0-75' <br />K - Hardcover 75-250' <br />N - Comparison of E.xisting and Proposed Building Envelopes <br />O - Floor Plans <br />P - Elevations <br />T - Analysis of Areas of First and Second Floors <br />U - Average Lakeshore Setback Line <br />Description of Request <br />Applicants seek approval of the same development plan submitted for the 1995 review.^ The <br />application involves the removal of the existing residence and the construction of a new 38' x 60 <br />two-story residence structure. Review Exhibit P of the Exhibits from Application #1997, the <br />maximum height of the structure to the top or peak of the roof wall be 32'. The legal height based <br />on the Orono Code is measured to the mean distance to peak of roof and is shown at 26+' (allowed <br />30'). The existing structure is 17' from the shoreline and the proposed structure will be 20. The <br />oriuinal footprint of the existing structure is 2.513.8 s.t. The proposed structure is 2.345 s.L The <br />property is subject to a lakeshore setback fronTtHe lagoon to the north and main lake to the south. <br />The structure will meet the required setback from the lagoon shoreline. <br />I he propertv is serv'ed with sewer and an on-site well located to the northeast side of residence. <br />Access to the property is achieved via an easement through the property to the immediate north and <br />east. Review Fixhibit B. <br />During the earlier review, the DNR had requested a minimum setback from the main lake of 25 . <br />Revie. f-xhibit G, Ceil Strauss has approved the 20' setback based on the drainage pattern of the <br />property. Ms. Strauss advises that she will not change her position trom the original review of 1995 <br />k