Laserfiche WebLink
proposed sii^iliv»k)fi configuration creates a "front lot* and a "hack lot" per the <br />tkfotttiom in the Subdivision Coik (Ordirunce No 122. Second Series), and the <br />newly created kHs are subject to the kM area, tot width and structural setback <br />standards of Subdivision Code SeetK^n 11 30. Subdivision (O This section <br />would require the platting of an "access outlot" as a separate ux parcel adiaccm <br />to the "front k«" kadii^ to the "back lot" <br />Section 11.30, Subdivish^n 5 (C) requires that the "access ouiltH" be 30 m width <br />That same Code scctKvn requires that the hack lot" conuin 150% of the minimum <br />zof^ district rtt^ircd ka area The LR 1A Zoning District required lot area is <br />2 0 acres Under the proposed configuration inca^qx^rating the required 30' wide <br />"access outlot". proposed Lot I (the "front lot ) would conuin 0 76 acres where <br />a 2.0 acre tot area ts required, and profKvsed Lot 2 (the "back lot") would contain <br />109 acres in area where 150% of the two acre standard, or 3 0 acres, is required. <br />Proposed Lots 1 and 2 meet the 200' required lot width at all required locations <br />with the exception that propivsed Ix>t 2 is only 190' in width at the street setback <br />where a 200' width is normally required <br />The property is within the Shoreland Overlay District and is subject to hardcover <br />limiutions The prt^)scd "access outlot" is in the 75-250* /one where only 25% <br />hardcover is normally allowed Hardcover in the "access outlot " as proposed <br />would be 35 0% . a 10% hardcover variance The proposed construction on Lots <br />I and 2 would not incorpivrate any hardcover into the 0-75' setback zone w here no <br />hardcover is normally allowed, but a variance for 78 hardcover where 25% <br />hardcover is allowed would be necessary tor the proposed construction on <br />proposed Lot 1 <br />The proposed subdiv isi»m w(’»uld cieaie two exireinely substandard lots from three <br />existing record lots which individually are currently unbmidable without many <br />vanarKes. The three existing lots have historically been used as a single property <br />There are a number of non-conformities attributable to the existing lots: <br />a Each of the three existing lots is less than the required two acre minimum <br />lot area requirement (Section 10 23, Subdivision 6 (B)( <br />Page 3 of 9