03-11-1996 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

FINDI>(;S The propeity is loaded in the LR 1 A. Sii^te Family Ukc^lH>rc Residential Zoning Distfict and comists of three individual adjacem ux parcels toulmg 1 9*> acre in «ea Existir^ Lot 10 is 0 62 acre in area, cxislu^ U>t 11 in 0 85 acre in area, and existing U>t 12 is 0 52 acre m area The property conuim tour buildings. comiNiing of the owners reMdcrKe. an old Twitie" used only for storage, and two rcnul cabins Lot 10 conuins the majority of driveway serving the property arkl iwo-thirds of the owner s residence smxtiae. Lot 11 conuins onc-third of the owner s rcsklencc structure, the house used for storage, and small comers of the two renul cabins Lot 12 conuins the majority of the two rcnul cabin structures The three properties have been commonly owned by Mr Maeser or his ptedecessor for more than twenty years, and have been used as a single homestead with two rcnul cabins for many years As part of the 1992 Stubbs Bay Sewer Project, the property was assessed one sewer unit to serve the owner's residence structure. Due to the non-contbrming structure and non conforming use sums of the rental cabins, those cabins were not provided with sewer nor assessed sewer units, nor was die storage building. On March 13. 1995, the owner appeared before the City Council regarding the status of the renul cabins The City Council on a vote of 5-0 required that the sewer connection to the owner's residence be connected within ninety days; that the cabins could continue to be rented for such time as the Code allows the septic system to remain until it is required to he upgraded; that upgrading of the septic svstem will not be allowed, that the cabins must be removed at the time septic system upgrading is required, that the owner must combine the three parcels into one ux parcel, and that an agreement between the owner and the City will be drafted by the owner's attorney in conjunction with the City's attorney in order to ensure the owner will abide by these conditions. The owner and applicant propose to replat this property from three tax parcels mio two ia,\ parcels, ea^h of which would constitute a separai' building site. T e Page 2 of 9