Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />would strongly oppose any attempt to acquire property for right-of-way purposes <br />within this area. <br />Still another major concern is the environmental impact upon the lake which <br />an expanded highway would have if constructed through the existing corridor. To <br />accomplish this bridging or extreme rip-rapping would apparently have to be <br />constructed on pa-^t of the southwesterly shore of the lake. Pollutants from this <br />portion of the highway would drain directly into the lake. Moving westerly, that <br />part of the expanded highway within the downtown area would be buffered by only a <br />jcouple hundred feet of land in an area sloping radically toward the lake. This <br />would cause further water quality problems. Long Lake is already hypereutrophic <br />and recent studies of the quality of run-off into the lake from sources witliin <br />the city have shown it to be poor. The city has constructed sedimentation ponding <br />areas to combat this problem and will do more in the future to fight it. A major <br />highway through the middle of town would likel*' undo these efforts and cause <br />irreparable injury to the lake. <br />III. ISSUES. The greatest issue concerning the relocation of Highway 12 <br />lies in the question of where it would be relocated. Long Lake recognizes that <br />other municipalities also have a strong and vested interest in this question. <br />It has been suggested that other municipalities lying within the limits of this <br />study have had difficulty in conducting any sort of planning process because of <br />uncertainity as to the relocation of the future highway. Long Lake has received <br />conwents and complaints from landowners, home builders and realtors concerning <br />what appears to be a de facto moritorium developing because of public uncerta'nity <br />as to the location of the highway. In other words, land values have frozen or <br />have become depressed in some areas and people have been reluncent to purchase <br />properties for fear that it might ei.d up within the corridor selected. Timing of <br />the selection has, therefore, becomi an important issue. <br />Given these circumstance' it appears as though the basic issue revolves <br />around the fact that everybody recognizes the need for an upgraded highway <br />system in this area but nobody wants it in their backyard. <br />Long Lake, obviously, supports relocation outside its city as above stated <br />Beyond that Long Lake is willing to support any relocation corridor which (1) <br />causes a minimum of disruption of existing hones and businesses, (2) causes <br />minimum disruption of environmentally sensitive areas and (3) maximizes the <br />potential for each municipality affected by the highway to meet its goals and <br />objectives, to maintain its comprehensive municipal plan and to continue to <br />effectively and efficiently administer necessary public services to its <br />residents.