Laserfiche WebLink
the applicant has not proposed to <br />adjustments to reduce the hardcover to acceptable <br />limits. <br />c. No acceptable hardship was demonstrated by the <br />applicant . <br />4. Hardcover in the 75-250’ zone currently ex^ at 5,776 <br />a 4! i-ir- n fiexcGGdinQ thG 25% hardcovGr limit by r <br />s!fl No justification has been “P^^a^istingallow additional structural hardcover while the existing <br />property already exceeds the limits i'"P°®®‘’^^y “ert^#1726. The Council finds no undue hardships to the property <br />Jhat justify granting a variance “hi-h would increase t^ <br />permanence of the already excessive hardcover in t.ie <br />zone. <br />5. (Optional, for discussion) The applicant is found to be <br />Tn violation of the hardcover limits ^“Pp®®^<5 <br />conditions of Resolution #1726, and is ^^^t or <br />future improvements which tend to increase .ooroved <br />permanence of hardcover on the property, will be approved. <br />fi rootional, for discussion) The applicant is hereby <br />Iranted after-the-fact approval for ^he existing excesses of <br />Liveway and sidewalk hardcover ^he '.’roperty. Sue <br />no further hardcover as currently defined will be appr <br />approval . <br />Page 2 of 3