Laserfiche WebLink
: 1 <br />on a case by case basis or in relation to achieving any <br />master plan arrangements tne City would desire. <br />There does not seem to be substantial interest at this point in <br />assisting any redevelopment, in part because of the experiences <br />of a neighboring community. The issue regarding redevelopment <br />may wall be one of the extent of public participation needed in <br />order to make the project work together with the security <br />guarantee given for the public participation by the developer. <br />(Presently the party interested in redevelopment is working on <br />general estimates to determine the extent of assistance needed in <br />order to undertake redevelopment of the south side.) <br />ACTION - <br />1. Make available an opportunity for those not present on the <br />June 1st meeting to hear the presentation. <br />2. Undertake a discussion on the next steps. <br />3. Take no action. <br />4. Table. <br />RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the opportunity be made <br />available for the presentation for those interested. It could <br />possibly be as part of a joint Planning Commission/Council <br />meeting tentatively scheduled for Saturday, JuJy 29. In addition <br />that meeting could include discussion of further steps. Further <br />topics could include financial and other related information on <br />the facilities study. <br />PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by _, that the Council <br />direct staff to set anot*Eer presentation of the Navarre <br />redevelopment information together with setting a time for <br />further discussions with Planning Commission on the direction for <br />Navarre. Ayes __, Nays __. <br />Planning Commission Members <br />Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator <br />Michael P. Gaffron, Planning & Zoning Asst. Administrator <br />John Shardlow, Dahlgren, Shardlow and Uban