My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-27-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
08-27-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/6/2024 12:14:54 PM
Creation date
12/6/2024 12:10:21 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
609
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
62139.2 <br />TOr Mayor and City Council <br />FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator <br />DATS: June 21, 1989 <br />SUBJECT; Navarre Redevelopment <br />ATTACHMENTS: A. Handouts From June 1, 1989 Meeting <br />ISSUE - Determine what direction that the Council desires to take <br />on this issue. <br />INTRODUCTION - At the meeting that was held regarding the Navarre <br />redevelopment a presentation was made as to problems and <br />possibilities together with discussing the range of alternatives <br />the City could undertake and a range of alternatives for <br />potential master planning or redevelopment. On behalf of the <br />staff I would like to aoologize for the breakdown in <br />communications with the Planning Commission and others who were <br />not fully informed of the meeting time and place. <br />As you may be aware interested property owners were in attendance <br />at that meeting indicating some of their needs and desires <br />regarding the area. In addition City staff has been approached <br />by a private development firm who has an interest in possible <br />redevelopment on the south side of County 15. <br />DISCUSSION - As noted there is a growing interest in this area, <br />not only from the City, but also from people currently in the <br />area and others from outside the area. <br />As discussed on the 1st t.he range of alternatives include; <br />A. Beautification - "Spruce up" the area in an effort to <br />promote the attractiveness of the area and therefore the <br />business. The level of involvement in helping implement <br />the Westonka Beautification Plan maybe an appropriate <br />avenue at this level of involvement. <br />B. Master Planninq /Comorehensive Plan amendment - The <br />current comprehensive plan and zoning for the area <br />reflects what was in place at the time it was created. <br />As noted in the attachments this is a hodge podge of <br />zoning uses and that longterm there may be a more <br />desireable land utilization in the area. One of the <br />alternatives would be to undertake a master planning or <br />the area to designate what the City would like to see in <br />that area as land uses and as changes come along that <br />they would need to fit into that plan. <br />Participation and Rede ^glooment — A third alternative <br />lid be to actually participate in redevelopment either
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.