Laserfiche WebLink
May 13. i®on <br />Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth <br />Building & Zoning Administrator <br />City of Orono <br />P. 0. Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay. MN 55323 ■frii'liio <br />RE: Reconsideration of Application 14-45 <br />Dear Ms. Mabusth: <br />Thank you for the letter of May 7, 1990. As you indicated, it has <br />been difficult for us to get our schedules coordinated. I sought to <br />meet with you in early April. Since you weren^t available. I spoke <br />with Michael Gaffron; however, he preferred to defer my case to you. <br />I have enclosed a site plan requesting permission from the City of <br />Orono to comply with the suggestion of my insurance carrier: to erecr <br />fencing of at least 5 feet in height. Wherever fencing of that height <br />would be installed on our property, a variance would be required. We <br />request permission to install fencing along the property boundaries to <br />the North and to the South. This would not exceed 5 feet in height <br />and would replace the 3 and 1/2 foot fencing presently in place. Also <br />requested are three small sections of gated fencing to the North of <br />the house, between the garage and the house and to the South of the <br />garage. We request permission to install this fencing between now and <br />the expiration date of our original Building Permit. <br />The landscaping done by the previous owners was put in place to follow <br />the boundary-1ine fencing. Fencing within the boundaries would "chop <br />up" our already small backyard area. I enclose a letter signed by my <br />two North and South neighbors indicating their support for our <br />request. <br />Mrs. Peterson and I heard the Council at the 12/11/89 meeting instruct <br />us to remove the fence installed in the Briar right-of-way and give us <br />permission to re-place that fence along our property line. That <br />action has been completed. The Council als.; gave permission for the <br />remainder of the new fence to be left as is. The notice of Council <br />action dated 12/'18/89 stated it as follows: "No further installaticn <br />of the privacy fence is approved...unti1 applicants submit a revised <br />site plan..." The new fence replaced existing fence that has since <br />been discarded. Hopefully, this will become a moot point, if the <br />Council approves our plan for fencing. <br />Because our conflicting schedules have delayed us in submitting this <br />site plan—I had hoped to meet with you personally—I must also <br />request an extension of the June 30, 1990 deadline for action, if the <br />Council does not approve our revised site plan. As a German teacher. <br />I am leading a small group of students to Europe and am remaining on <br />to participate in a German educators workshop from June 5 through <br />early July. <br />Sincerely <br />jory"'Gregory and Julianne Peterson