Laserfiche WebLink
Mayor and City CouncilTO: <br />FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrate <br />DATE: July 18, 1990 <br />SUBJECT: Administrator's Information <br />718^0.2 <br />\ <br />V <br />2 3 i930 <br />19 72 SHADYWOOD ROAD - To date the City is still awaiting word <br />from the Judge on tin is matter. <br />ELECTRICAL UTILITIES TERRITORIES - Staff met with representatives <br />from Wright Hennepin on July 11, 1990 to discuss the possibility <br />of territorial shifts and rates. Wright Hennepin outlined that <br />given the various credits that can be taken, that in the period <br />from May through September, that their rate schedule is not <br />substantially different on average than those of NSP. However, <br />NSP has a lower rate as noted in the attachement between October <br />and May. Wright Hennepin has not changed their rates for 10 <br />years and does not expect to change rates for a considerable <br />period of time. NSP on the other hand has currently an <br />approximately 7% increase and unsure as to what increases they <br />may have in the next five to ten years. The reason Wright <br />Hennepin, which used to be lower than NSP's, are where they are <br />at is because Wright Hennepin together with 13 other Cooperatives <br />went together as United Power Association and built a power plant <br />and transmission line from North Dakota. With this move they <br />feel will last ther for a considerable period of time. On the <br />other hand NSP whi > generally has older generating plants and <br />nuclear plants may be faced with higher rates in the longterm <br />future to update or replace and/or mothball such facilities. <br />As far as territory, Wright Hennepin indicated that they had no <br />desire to give up any territory and there did not seem to be any <br />present possiblity of territorial swaps. A discussion with NSP's <br />representative in a subsequent telephone conversation indicated <br />that in the near future the two may get together to see if such <br />could be identified. Staff will keep Council apprised cf any <br />developments. <br />PETERSON/STODOLA - As you may recall the City denied the owners <br />of this property to have a stand-alone dock. They were directed <br />to remove it in the spring of '89 and after they failed to remove <br />it warning tickets wore issued. This subsequently came to court <br />OR July 13, 1990. The defendents attorney attempted to make a <br />motion to have the criminal matters delayed until a civil matter <br />that he had filed on July 10, 1990 could be considered. The <br />Judge denied that, and the defendents have agreed to remove the <br />dock by August 13, 1990. Attached is a copy of the civil lawsuit <br />which was received by the City on July 18, 1990. This will be <br />referred to the City's insurance company. <br />HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR STUDY - Attached is the timetable presented <br />Ey the consultant at the Technical Committee meeting on Tuesday, <br />July 17, 1990. In a related note the staff has delayed until the <br />August 13, 1990 meeting consideration of a transportation <br />consultant for the City in relation to an upgraded Highway 12.