My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-23-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
07-23-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 2:17:32 PM
Creation date
11/19/2024 2:14:31 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
303
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
power to police. The‘^ are limited also, no doubt, by <br />constitutional and coinmon law rights of various persons.” <br />RESPONSE: We recommend that the LMCD continue to rely on <br />its own counsel for interpretation of its powers. The LMCD <br />counsel has reviewed the plan and does not reach the conclusions <br />of the City of Orono. <br />We recommend no change in approach or emphasis. <br />Page 2, paragraph 5, sentences 3 and 4. "It is likewise clear <br />that the words "recreational management, user enjoyment,' and <br />eve. the word 'access' (except as part of a modifying phrase) are <br />absent from the enabling legislation. Nowhere is the piCD given <br />the power to spend money to reach the goal of 'rectifying past <br />inequi' and [sic] access growth'." <br />RESPONSE: We fail to see a constructive point to this <br />entire paragraph. <br />The phrases may or may not appear in Chapter 907, as <br />amended. But the LMCD clearly has powers in each of these <br />areas. The powers of the LMCD to spend money are clear. They <br />may own real property. But we do not recommend that the LMCD own <br />access or other recreational lands. We feel public corporations <br />already in existence are better prepared to do so. <br />We recommend no change in approach or content. <br />i^Page 2, paragraph 5, sentence 5 and 6. "Nor is there anything in <br />the statute to suggest that it is an 'essential function of the <br />LMCD to assure that other agencies have the resources to <br />implement their programs'. Even the proposed extension of zoning <br />\and land use control is probably not authorized." <br />RESPONSE: That quote comes not from the statute, but from <br />the Management Pro<^ram. The fact that it does not appear in the <br />legislation does not lessen its veracity. <br />Two years ago, we were charged with the difficult task of <br />getting 14 communities, various sub-county and county agencies, <br />regional entities and the DNR to agree on a common set of goals <br />for the lake. Before we started two years ago we knew that <br />significant'changes in authority would not be permitted by the <br />vested interests in and around the lake. <br />Therefore, we developed a set of goals and objectives to be <br />implemented using existing powers and author*ties. To do that <br />requires cooperation, coordination and communicat The LMCD <br />legislation specifically gives it authority in t’ ^reas. We <br />believe that when the Management Program is adof. id it will <br />be), it will succeed. There will just be better ation, <br />coordination, and communication with come legal enr.iuies more <br />than others. <br />38
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.