Laserfiche WebLink
FILE #LA24-000059 <br />18 November 2024 <br />Page 4 of 7 <br /> <br /> <br />After reviewing the preliminary plat drawing it does not appear the calculations for “dry” meet the requirements <br />within the code [Cite: Section 82-254 – Lot area, minimum]. In areas not served by sanitary sewer, each lot must <br />contain a minimum of two acres of contiguous dry buildable land exclusive of public rights-of-way, vehicular <br />easements, or areas at or below the floodplain elevation for a specific property. The preliminary plat drawing <br />identifies the gross area, dry area, and wetland area but does not explicitly identify the qualifying contiguous land <br />areas. Further, the definition of “dry, buildable land” excludes areas where slopes exceed 30%. <br /> <br />The developer has identified three small areas where portions of slopes exceed 30%. The preliminary plat should <br />identify all bluffs and steep slopes. Bluffs are defined as having the following characteristics: (1)Part or all of the <br />feature is located in a shoreland area; (2)The slope rises at least 25 feet above the ordinary high water level of the <br />water body; (3)The grade of the slope from the toe of the bluff to a point 25 feet or more above the ordinary high <br />water level averages 30 percent or greater; and (4)The slope must drain toward the water body) and steep slopes <br />(defined as: areas where average slopes are 12 percent or greater as measured over horizontal distances of 50 feet <br />or more, that are not bluffs) confirm this [Cite: Sec 78-1211 - Shoreland Definitions]. <br /> <br />The preliminary plat should be updated to address the minimum required lot areas and any other missing or <br />ambiguous information identified above. As submitted, Lot 5 (the lakeshore lot) does not meet the 200’ width <br />requirement at the lake or the required minimum 2 acres of dry, contiguous buildable area and must be <br />reconfigured to meet the city standards. <br /> <br />Development Outlot: <br />Included in the development is proposed “Lot 6” which does not meet the requirements to be considered a <br />buildable lot. It appears the developer intends to create an outlot for lake access or common, private open space <br />for the development. City Code Section 78-1278 provides for the creation of an outlot to provide owners of off-lake <br />lots within the development access to the lake. However, this lot, as proposed does not meet the minimum <br />requirements to do so. The developer should discuss their intent for this property. <br /> <br />A lot created for lake access purposes must meet the following minimum standards: <br /> <br />Standard / Minimum Requirement: Discussion: <br />1. Lakeshore access lots shall be designated as an outlot and <br />shall not be considered to be a buildable lot. <br /> <br />“Lot 6” is currently shown as a non-buildable <br />lot and should be platted as an “outlot”. <br /> <br />2. A lake access outlot shall not be subject to minimum lot area <br />or width standards, except that the number of off-lake <br />properties to gain access via the lake access outlot shall not <br />exceed the number obtained by dividing the outlot width <br />measured at the shoreline by the required zoning district lot <br />width, rounded down to the nearest whole number. <br /> <br />Four of the lots do not have lake access. To <br />serve all four lots, the lake access outlot <br />would need to have a minimum defined <br />width of 800 feet (=4 lots x 200’). As <br />proposed, the outlot’s width at the OHWL is <br />±300 feet and could only support one off- <br />lake property. <br /> <br />3. Such outlot shall be jointly owned by all owners of the off-lake <br />lots in the subdivision who are provided riparian access rights <br />on the access outlot. <br /> <br />Only one property could own and use the <br />outlot for lake access purposes. <br />4. No such access outlot shall be created as part of a subdivision <br />plat except when the building lots within the subdivision are <br />separated by an existing public or private roadway from the <br />lakeshore, and the land on either side of the roadway was in <br />common ownership as of the effective date of Ordinance No. <br />There is no existing roadway to support the <br />creation of a lake access outlot. <br />96