07-09-1990 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

B)The most recent hardcover approval granted on November 28, 1988 per Resolution #2546, allowed no net hardcover increase from previous approvals but allowed applicant to trade off portions of driveway and sidewalk for other specific additions. C)In 1989 during the remodeling process, applicant removed the circular deck on the lake side of the house for convenience of construction. The applicant was unaware that removal of that deck would require a variance to reconstruct or replace it, because it encroached into the 0-75* lakeshore setback zone. D)In the current application,applicant proposes the following improvements: 1)Construction of a loop driveway within the property boundaries, constituting additional hardcover in the 75-250* lakeshore setback zone. 2)Replacement of the formerly existing circular deck, with a slightly smaller hardcovered terrace area, encroaching into the 0-75* lakeshore setback zone. 3)Construction of sidewalks constituting additional hardcover in the 75-250* lakeshore setback zone. 4)Construction of a 6* high fence along the street lot line, exceeding the 3 1/2* height normally allowed at that location, and constituting approximately 35 square feet of additional hardcover in the 75-250* lakeshore setback zone. 5)Construction of retaining walls along the west end of the house to accomodate grade changes previously approved in that area, for an additional 68 square feet of hardcover in the 75-250* lakeshore setback zone. E)The proposed improvements would result in a net decrease in hardcover in the 0-75*zone from 2.9% (associated with the formerly existing circular deck) down to 2.6% with the proposed terrace. No hardcover is normally alloweed in the 0-75* zone. Page 2 of 7 in »r ir t9 It le :y '90* \e re id id Id 2d 'y )r id 2r -y id In .e le jr In :o n, }f .d jd >e