My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-09-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
07-09-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2024 1:09:08 PM
Creation date
11/18/2024 1:05:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
550
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />^,4 <br />Mayor Grabek & Orono Council MembersCity Administrator Bernhardson <br />Prom: <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning Zoning Administrator <br />July 2, 1990 MEETIHG <br />■^UL 9 1990#1465 Gerald T. McCourtney, 1055 West Ferndale Road - <br />Variances - Resolution <br />Application - <br />1)Hardcover Variance <br />2)Fence Height Variance <br />OF omo <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - <br />Exhibit B - <br />Exhibit <br />Exhibit <br />Exhibit <br />Exhibit <br />Exhibit <br />w <br />C <br />D <br />E <br />F <br />G <br />M <br />Proposed Site Plan <br />Staff Sketches - Hardcover at Various Stages <br />Staff Review, Net Conceptual Request <br />Hardcover Comparative Review <br />Planning Commission Action Notice 6/21/90 <br />Proposed Fence Plans <br />Memo & Exhibits of 6/14/90 <br />Sunnnary ~ <br />1.Revised plan requests 43.9% hardcover in 75-250' zone (up <br />from 38.2% previously approved), which includes a loop <br />driveway; and a decrease (2.9% down to 2.6%) in 0-75' zone. <br />2.At previously approved 38.2%,applicant cannot keep existing <br />backup apron without significantly reducing proposed size of <br />sidewalks and terrace (which replaces old circular deck <br />removed during remodeling). <br />3.If the loop driveway is denied (as Planning Commission <br />recommends), applicant still requests 40.4% to allow <br />retention of the backup apron, construction of necessary <br />retaining walls, and construction of walks and a terrace <br />commensurate with the house. Planning Commission <br />conceptually recommended that no increase above 38.2% be <br />allowed. <br />4.Applicant further requests a 6' fence along the street lot <br />line where only 3^'fence would be allowed.Planning <br />Commission recommended approval of this fence, which <br />replaces an old stockade fence. <br />5. <br />6. <br />Attached resolution reflects Planning Commission <br />recommendations. <br />Staff recommends that the backup apron be retained, the loop <br />driveway be denied, and the fence be approved. Council <br />must determine whether it is appropriate to allow hardcover <br />increases to allow the proposed square footages of terrace <br />and sidewalks.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.