Laserfiche WebLink
-» •,fv|i {V V" ■ ;rv-*’v*i tctt-tt j'..u».r<.a --"jT*>^r..■:•#•--. <br />^iV <br />■-’■y . <br />3* Lot: 4 is also deficient in re^di^ds to lot area and <br />Lot width requirements as follows: <br />Lot 4 actual area is 20,202 s.f. - short <br />1,578 s.f. (7%) <br />Lot 4 actual width is 60 ft. - short 40 S ' <br />ft. (40%) V- <br />4.Lot 4 contains a residence which is deficient in <br />regards to required setbacks as follows: <br />Actual lake setback 64 ft. - short 11 <br />ft. (15%) <br />North side setback 6 ft. - short 4 <br />ft. (40%) <br />5.Lorge has failed to apply for a variance for side <br />yard setback for the house of Lot 4. <br />6.Lorge has failed to apply for a variance from the <br />lot area requirements of the zoning Code for Lots 3 and 4. <br />7.Lot 3 was owned in common with abutting Lot 4 of <br />Auditor's Subdivision No. 265 by applicant Lorge from 1972 until <br />May, 1980, when Lorge sold Lot 4 and retained Lot 3. <br />8* Lot 3 had been owned in common with Lot 4 since <br />1920 by a succession of 5 different owners. <br />9.Lot 3 and Lot 4 had frequently been combined by <br />prior owners on one Torrens Certificate and since 1940 Lot 3 and <br />4 have been combined on one Torrens Certificate. <br />10.Lots 3 and 4 have frequently been encumbered jointly <br />by one or more mortgages since 1940, and during the time period <br />when Lorge owned Lot 3 and 4. <br />11.Vacant Lot 3 has since 1920 been used as lawn area <br />for the residence of Lot 4. with this use and with the lots in <br />common ownership, the two lots combined met all the District <br />Honing requirements, except lakeshore setback, as follows: <br />Lot 3 & 4 combined lot area - 39,843 s.f. <br />Lot 3 and & combined lot width - 120 ft. <br />North side setback - 66 ft. <br />12« The driveway access for the residence on Lot 4 <br />crosses subject Lot 3 and enters the public street frcxa Lot 3. <br />Page 2 of 6