Laserfiche WebLink
of these properties which would intensify the use. <br />Other Facilities - These include further acguistion of <br />park land, fishing piers, development of anchorages and <br />the Big Island acquisition and increased utilization <br />discussed in the plan. <br />While some of the aspect of the plan are promoted to <br />reduce the actual lake usage by attracting persons and <br />watercraft to an "inactive status" such as anchorages, <br />they may however generate more total traffic on the lake <br />as the lake will have more amenities to attract people. <br />The primary issues are: <br />1. Specific concerns are that will increase traffic <br />a. ) By type of craft <br />b. ) By level of total usage <br />c. ) After effects of usage (litter, etc.) <br />2. What regulation will there be and how effective is it <br />a. LMCD - Are there limitations of its ability to <br />achieve its goals through regulation. <br />b. Alternatives - <br />1. The city exercise the maximum authority it is <br />allowed. <br />2. Joint powers of the cities which is possible if <br />there is not a county establishes lake improvement <br />district. (LMCD is not a county established lake <br />improvement district.) <br />3. "Regulated" in a similar manner to other lakes <br />which do not have conservation districts. (It <br />should be remembered however that this was the <br />situation prior to the LMCD's existence and was <br />probably the rationale for LMCD.) <br />Specific Policy Concerns - The following represent <br />concerns in specific areas: <br />1. Marinas <br />a. Expansion and density of site and current rules <br />that allow them to expand. <br />b. Their ability to add additional property to the <br />marinas. <br />. . .c. Impact on other issues such as hardcover, abutting <br />■ • * properties etc. —