Laserfiche WebLink
929.4 it would be <br />back this may go pa <br />'pful to have a map to illustrate how far <br />.iularly in bays such as Tanager etc. <br />Page 50. The discussion regarding the busiest day on the lake of <br />2,256 active boats during peak hours (a density of 5.2/acres per <br />boat or 6.2 of total surface) again brings into question the <br />issue of when and how the peak is measured to determine the <br />implementation of various density restrictions usable. <br />Page 53. Management Objections - Although LMCD*s plan indicates <br />that the shoreland regulations are to be adopted by the <br />individual communities, LMCD is working to develop agreements for <br />review of specific types of applications regarding building <br />height and riparian parcel variances. Referral of each of these <br />to LMCD for review could become, to a degree, burdensome but <br />would probably less of a problem for Orono than some of the other <br />cities. It is assumed these would be for variances that would be <br />variances to LMCD's base line regulations. (If a community had <br />more stringent codes; variances to its codes, which would not be <br />variances to LMCD's base line, would not need to be reviewed by <br />LMCD.) <br />Page 55. The discussion for neighborhood parks it says the <br />responsibility is for by "owning" municipality. This questions <br />whether in Hennepin County facility such as Noerenberg if the <br />City would still be able to exercise law enforcement abilities in <br />that area. <br />Page 56. The encouragement of additional public development of <br />Big Island is something that is of concern to at least the City <br />of Orono as to how extensive this may be, who is the implementing <br />agency and what control, if any, the City would have in that <br />expansion. (The Orono Comprehensive Plan however, does state <br />that the best ownership of Big Island is by public entity such as <br />Hennepin County Parks.) <br />V. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION - <br />Apart from stormwater management, the City has little ability to <br />control in this area. As you may recall in 1984 court case the <br />City of Orono was not allowed jurisdiction in a dredging case but <br />that jurisdiction rested with the DNR and the Watershed District. <br />It should be noted that the upgraded monitoring program would be <br />a laudable goal for this valuable resource. <br />T - -- "