My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-29-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
05-29-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2024 2:58:10 PM
Creation date
10/29/2024 2:54:59 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
434
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members <br />City Administrator Bernhardson <br />From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administra <br />Date: May 25, 1990 <br />Subject: #1515 Jeffrey Johnson, 3825 Cherry Avenue - <br />Variances - Resolution <br />I^AYg <br />•errYoe <br />^^990 <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit F - Enlarged Plat Map Designating Applicant's <br />Multiple Lot Ownership & Adjacent Neighbor's <br />Exhibit I - Site Plan Locating Existing Cat Walk & Proposed <br />Cat Walk on Applicant's Property <br />Exhibit L - Original Approval Resolution Proposed at 5/14/90 <br />Meeting of the Council <br />At the May 14th meeting of the Council, staff was directed <br />to contact the adjacent neighbor to determine if there was any <br />willingness on the part of the neighbor to consider a shared use <br />of the catwalk. It was clear from the very beginning in <br />discussing the City's concerns with Paula Johnson that she and <br />her husband are more concerned with protecting their existing <br />riparian rights. In further discussions with Mrs. P. Johnson <br />staff advised that her current dock was a non-conforming <br />structure as the properties were not legally combined and if the <br />dock sections were to be structurally repaired, the City would <br />require not only the legal combination of the multiple lots but <br />variance approval. In addition, staff called attention to the <br />fact that portions of the dock were located within the unimproved <br />public right-of-way. Mrs. P. Johnson was completely on the <br />defensive at that point. Staff should add that original contact <br />was not initiated by staff, but rather by Mrs. P. Johnson, <br />obviously as follow up to earlier exchanges with Jeff Johnson, <br />the applicant. Mrs. P. Johnson then alluded to the vacation of <br />Cherry Avenue and that she would no longer need the approval of <br />the Public Works Department. Staff then advised her that this <br />was one of the issues raised with Jeff Johnson's application, and <br />there was a definite need to use the unimproved right-of-way of <br />Cherry Avenue to provide access to dock on lakeshore lot, and <br />that an application to vacate Cherry Avenue would be opposed by <br />the applicant or a future owner of applicant's property. The <br />public right-of-way defined within Cherry Avenue provides the <br />only legal access to the lakeshore portion of Johnson's property. <br />Staff has discussed the potential vacation of Cherry Avenue <br />with a representative of the DNR, Ceil Strauss, and she also <br />confirmed that it would be most appropriate to vacate the right- <br />of-way of a roadbed that was apparently located within the lake- <br />bed of Lake Minnetonka. Please remember, the majority of the <br />wetland area to the east of applicant's property is below the <br />929.4' elevation.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.