05-29-1990 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF APRIL 16, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ZONING FILE #1516-MACMILLAN CONTINUEDinclude only the dedication of the cul-de-sac at this time. Gaffron's interpretation is that the cul-de-sac be constructed at this-time. Caffron stated that clarification will be necessary. Larry Hanson said, "I have a strong suspicion that no matter where the cul-de-sac is located, once future development occurs, it will be in thr> wrong place." Kelley stated that it would not make sense to move the cul- de-sac down toward to Fox Street. Bellows stated that perhaps the cul-de-sac does not make sense. Gaffron stated that from a safety aspect and the requirements of the Building Code, a cul-de-sac should be included. Gaffron asked Larry Hanson how wide the gravel portion the road is. Larry Hanson replied that the gravel portion is 16' wide. Kelley quickly reviewed the issues involved with this application. The Planning Commission agri^ed that the grade is too steep to realign the Outlot as proposed by the City Engineer. Kelley observed that the existing 16' paved portion of the drivew'* will serve more houses than the gravel portion of the road. - City is asking that the gravel portion be constructed mee ity standards which require a 24' or 26' paved width. In regard to the tennis court, Kelley stated that it should ^ removed. Moos, Cohen, Kelley, Bellows and Johnson agreed that the cul- de-sac is not necessaryi Kelley stated that Outlot C should be aligned along the existing driveway. As far as the upgrading of Outlot C, Kelley stated that the portion to be upgraded is beyond the driveway entrance of the new lot. Johnson suggested that Outlot C not r>e upgraded until Outlot B is developed. Bellows, Kelley Cohen favored upgradi. .ition, and Moos agreed with Johnson. ;<tlot C to a 24 foot width. Johnson stated that Lot 1, Block 1, still presented a problem because of the fact tiiat it is a buildable Ir t . - 4 - .-“r >• -•