Laserfiche WebLink
MINDTES of APRIL 16, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />ZONING FILE #1516-MACMILLAN CONTINUED <br />the existing maple woods if we tried to put a road through to the <br />nnblic road. There is also the fact that other parties, other <br />than the MacMillans are involved with the ownership of these <br />properties." <br />Bellows asked how access to Outlot A will be achieved. <br />Larry Hanson stated that Outlot A does not meet standards <br />for a buildable lot at this time, which is why it has been <br />designated as an outlot. <br />Johnson observed that Lot 1, Block 1, appears to be a <br />buildable lot and asked what purpose it will serve. <br />Larry Hanson replied, "Though that lot is large enough, <br />there is ^no intention to build there. That parcel was brought <br />into the subdivision because part of it was needed to enlarge Lot <br />2. " <br />Bellows asked why it could not be combined with Lot 2. <br />Mr. Taylor explained that there are different entities <br />involved. <br />Kelley stated that though the City Engineer may have good <br />reasons for his alignment of Outlot C, it did not make sense. <br />Caffron asked for the Planning Commission's opinion <br />regarding the cul-de-sac. <br />Kelley stated that the cul-de-sac will run by the front of <br />the Norton house. <br />Bellows asked if it would be possible to locate the cul- <br />de-sac further south where the grade is more flat. <br />Baldwin state * that the MacMillans have a large garden in <br />that area. <br />Mrs. MacMillan asked why the cul-de-sac could not be located <br />in Outlot B. <br />Kelley stated that there are steep slope*"that area. <br />Gaffron informed Bellows that placing tne cul-de-sac more to <br />the south may interfere with drainfield sites. <br />Kelley asked if it would be sensible to take half of the cul- <br />de-sac from the Nortons and the other half from the MacMillans. <br />Bellows interpreted the City Engineer's recommendation to <br />- 3 -