My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-23-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
04-23-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/22/2024 11:54:57 AM
Creation date
10/22/2024 11:54:22 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
266
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
41690.3 <br />TOs Mayor and City Council <br />FROM: Hark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato <br />DATE: April 13, 1990 <br />SUBJECT: Engineering Review <br />APR 23 1990 <br />^ITYOFOROffo <br />Attachment:A. Engineering Review Dated 3/2/90 (Memo Only) <br />B. In-House Configuration Drafts <br />ISSUE - Presentation to Council of additional information <br />regarding the estimated cost of in-house service. <br />pTRODUCTION - At the Council's meeting of February 26, 1990 the <br />following information was presentated. It was requested that <br />staff provide additional information to Council regarding the <br />estimated cost of an in-house engineer. <br />DISCUSSION - An estimate of in-house staff would include one of <br />two configurations outlined in Attachment B. <br />The estimates are using 1990 as a base and are very rough <br />estimates particularily for the outside consulting budget. In a <br />year where there are significant projects the range in cost from <br />a possible savings up to an additional $24,000 depending on the <br />amount of project work done in-house. In a year where there are <br />no significant projects the range of additional costs go up an <br />additional $66,000. The main difference in cost is that the <br />current approach has the payment only when utilized, the in-house <br />approach has a "fixed" cost if staff levels are not changed based <br />on project needs. <br />ALTERNATIVES - <br />1. Accept the information. <br />2. Table for further discussion. <br />3. Take no action. <br />RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that the Council accept the <br />information at this point and request this item be placed on the <br />agenda for further discussion at the May 29, 1990 Council <br />meeting. In the meantime please feel free to discuss any <br />questions or Issues you may have with me in the interim. <br />PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _, seconded by _, that Council <br />accepts the information presented and tables further action to <br />the Hay 29, 1990 Council meeting. Ayes _, Nays _.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.