Laserfiche WebLink
' I'vr <br />Zoning File #1494 <br />April 4, 1990 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />^ ‘'Ccnparlson of Original fc Amended Proposals <br />Structural addition: <br />Original Presented for Planning Commission Review <br />3/19/90 = 665 s.f. <br />Amended *= 530 s.f. <br />Driveway; <br />Original Proposal * 3,318 s.f. <br />Amended Proposal * 3,318 s.f. <br />Patio; <br />Original Proposal * 1,071 s.f. <br />Amended Proposal * 741 s.f. <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - Application <br />Exhibit B - Applicant's Addendum Dated 4/2/90 <br />Exhibit C - Property Owners List <br />Exhibit D - Plat Map , . . w <br />Exhibit E - Original Proposal from Planning Commission Meeting <br />2/20/90 <br />Exhibit F - Amended Proposal from Planning Commission Meeting <br />3/19/90 <br />Exhibit G - Neighbor's Letter 2/13/90 , /oo <br />Exhibit H - Farmer's Insurance Group of Companies 3/5/90 <br />Exhibit I - Survey „zo /onExhibit J - Amended Upper Floor Plan for Council Meeting 4/9/90 <br />Exhibit K - Amended Lower Floor Plan for Council Meeting 4/9/90 <br />Exhibit L - Amended Site Plan for Council Meeting 4/9/90 <br />Review of Application - r <br />The applicant proposes an addition to the lakeside of the <br />existing structure and the replacement of an existing grade level <br />patio with a pool and patio area that encroaches the average <br />lakeshore setback line. The property already at 47% <br />within the 75-250' setback area requires approval of hardcover <br />variances, although a net reduction of 612 s.f. or 4.2% is <br />proposed in this current plan. <br />At the February 20, 1990 meeting of the Planning Commission, <br />the applicant proposed a plan that would require an encroachmen <br />of tne average setback line by a two story lakeside addition. <br />This proposal also included a more excessive encroachment of the <br />average setback line by a pool and patio improvement in the <br />lakeshore yard. At the March 19, 1990 meeting of the Planning <br />Commission, the amended plan no longer showed an encroachment of <br />the average setback line of the proposed structural addition. <br />The recent amendment of the accessory structure ordinance tnat <br />would now include pool and patio areas was legally effective as <br />of the date of the Planning Commission meeting, and as a result, <br />the area of the pool and patio proposed in the March I9tn <br />proposal would require lot coverage variances for structural <br />improvements.