My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-26-1990 Countil Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
03-26-1990 Countil Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/14/2024 2:17:06 PM
Creation date
10/14/2024 2:15:38 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
385
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
a bathroom improvement may realize 75% of their investment <br />where someone who puts in a pool may realize only 20% of <br />their investment at the future sale of the property. <br />Lateral Options - The two areas were offered the option of <br />extending laterals p'-oviding they pay for the assessment. <br />The question was* if they do not have a lateral, can the City <br />prove the market benefit? <br />Should sufficient numbers not indicate an interest in doing <br />the trunk only, the City may in fact do the lateral and <br />assess the trunk and put a connection charge for the lateral <br />portion of it thereby better insuring it would get its full <br />value. The staff indicated past projects absent Crystal Bay <br />were paid for by those receiving sewer (currently staff is <br />reviewing all projects to verify this.) <br />City Contribution - <br />6. Other funding source3 - To the best of our knowledge there <br />are no oth^r funding sources that are available. The City is <br />willing, however, to finance this over a 15 to 20 year <br />period, both the assessment and any connection charges the <br />City may charge. <br />7. Who is providing the momentum for this project? <br />residents? While the City had in <br />Is it the <br />its Comprehensive Plan in <br />1980 identified this area as an a. ea for sewering the primary <br />imputus has been from the neighborhood from those people who <br />have failed or failing systems, from those on holding tanks, <br />and from those who wish to improve their properties but can't <br />because of septic system constraints. As such, it will be up <br />to the residents themselves to decide if they want this <br />project to go ahead or not.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.