03-26-1990 Countil Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

B* Adequacy - Even with 2 full acres, that acerage may not have adequate septic sites available. C. Experience - If there has been a history of problems with the system, it would be appropriate that the property be sewered unless it could be proven that suitable alternate sites exist on the property. D. Proximity - Given the proximity to a sewer line anything abutting it in this area would be appropriate to served. The issue boils down to where the appropriate line is drawn. The result of the analysis contained as Attachment B indicates which properties could be excluded at the 2 acre level under specific conditions. All the others are recommended for inclusion as they are below 2 acres and in close proximity to the sewer. Issue #2 Related Issues A. East of Leaf Street - The properties had previously not been included in the study area analysis. However, as indicated in Attachment B most are substandard older systems, and have questionable replacement capabilities. The cost of construction to include them is substantially less than their prorata share of the project. B. Blanche Property ~ Mr. Blanche had indicated his concern as to service to his property. An alternative has been developed to avoid this screening removal that he was concerned with and as such could be appropriately included in the project. (Part of this issue was that the main stub that would go along Bayside would serve only him at a rather substantial coct. The City can either do that or a separate private service to the main on Westlake Street.) Policy Alternatives Issue *1 - 1. Include all the properties subdivision. in the original study area 2. Exempt all the properties that have requested. 3. Exempt selected properties under specified conditions of proving capability to solve future problems on site. 4. Charge properties a trunk charge rather than a lateral charge with specifications and conditions for when a lateral is to be constructed.