Laserfiche WebLink
.jhe Planning tevUw‘topptoval. TUe ^ finding® the^‘-"■'r.vS B i%v.v;:K» s..>. ■Ithin the lakesn years.01 ti.e - „ ,eco«.ena.tlon -«ents and Planning Co.«” rommission Minutes of 1/16/90Planning CommissionVang'S Memo of 3/7 <br />ittucture. Mr. ^ a as requested <br />.helt 'to p" o»iae the tepo« « 'j? u„til <br />;ty ana .„££ advised Yf^ctural analysis <br />commission. Star ®V ,^^uncil action., in order to detetmi ^^^^^^^ f Cou^ <br />ary as part of ^ne^^ under lying intent^^^ ^ <br />nind Council w_«t house structxy^ _ have the <br />“« se"tS.o°/‘.te°." ‘= uy ins ‘he 0-75 setp« „^y the city > staff <br />•riorate structures. T ® soundness <br />I repairs of sucn not oniy^" ,^3 have <br />the determine what building <br />“■ "s.vs.r. r.'~” <br />" ""'•■•■“ ............................ <br />? of the water. <br />Zoning File #1483 March 7, 1990 Page 6It should also be noted at this point in the review that we are not dealing with a conditional use permit as the structure is not a second residential unit/guest house. Structural repairs to this structure requires multiple variances to the lakeshore standards of the zoning code (hardcover and lakeshore setback variances). It is difficult to determine the setback from the lakeshore as the structure has never been designated on a survey. If the structure is to remain, an updated survey must be submitted confirming the exact location of this structure in relation to the 929.4' elevation (lakeshore of Lake Minnetonka).The Planning Commission recommended approval of the application that would allow the structure to remain for an unlimited period of time based on the hardship that the structure was allowed to remain and that applicant had no knowledge of the circumstances surrounding the legality of the structure. Approval was conditioned upon applicant obtaining a building permit for all repairs made to structure and applicant providing <br />an analysis by a structural engineer of the Integrity of the <br />structure. <br />Options o£ Action - <br />The options of action remain the swsie as set forth on Pages <br />4 through 5 of the memo to the Planning Commission. Staff would <br />add that if the structure is to remain, that the following <br />conditions be added to the Planning Commission's recommendation: <br />1. An updated survey be provided locating the 929,4' <br />elevation and the subject structure within the lakeshore <br />yard. <br />2. Resolve of water supply to structure and the need to cut <br />off water supply if structure is to remain as storage/three- <br />season porch. <br />Options of action - denial, approval or approval with <br />specified period of time for removal at some future date. <br />Council Action - <br />To provide conceptual direction to staff to prepare the <br />appropriate resolution for Council action at an upcoming meeting.