03-12-1990 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

» 483- 1990iAction -6 Of the foil owing recommendation on onele^apoYl* °^"®*"®^^*thiVeqSired>r requlr®d removal back in 197?^e« !!*? scheduledthe structure would have re|ulied '®P«^r*«‘4"rr®a a land use review.;ructures^/o^”be ViT structure and similarve\"e? *^®9“latlons fo*"/^laJesh"^^^®^ ^^®velopment, the ComprehMslvt^vi f residential e regulations of the st^vJ ^^® City, andBources. State Department of Natural ructures wlthYn^\he*'o-7^''%tb?^i?^^**® contain>™ the City before rfn«^ »®®J' approval ^ucture. The city would qilstloS"*^® "®‘*® sn it appears obvious " u property owner .lv.d re„cv,tiran‘d'‘V«.IS^?i„* *>«" ?T2 appxdcnt. >y mid-spring of *990?^^*^ *** that the structure he re ”f XTofx “x*»ay consider The City staff fai-i inai directive to rem*ote‘U"".te‘.‘t'/uc^ireT^'” -l-ture and the dir%“t*i^‘? Sl^hV o‘r'’o1.o'‘&”f L^rs^^® ®xact ^sTatui of*the”ort h®^ neverLarson appeared to mak« J? ? **®“®® structure. ure and certainly did minimal upk2ip. “®® ^^® Zoning File #1483 January 12, 1990 Page 5 of 53. Optional approval. The Planning Commission may find the unique background and conflicting findings of this review to be divided between the ordinance demands of the City and the property rights of the applicants, and may consider granting approval based on the condition that the accessory structure located within the lakeshore yard be removed within * specific period of time - _ _ __ years.Additional Comments and Planning Commission Recommenuatlon - March 7, 1990 -Additional Exhibits -Exhibit 0 - Planning Commission Minutes of 1/16/90 Exhibit P - Vang's Memo of 3/7/90One of the conditions of the Planning Commission recommendation was that the applicant was to provide a report from a structural engineer confirming the structural stability of the boat house structure. Mr. Vogt has phoned since that meeting to advise that their personal friend, a licensed engineer, is now out of the country and unable to provide the report as requested by the Planning Commission. Staff advised Mr. Vogt to wait until Council's review in order to determine if the structural analysis will be necessary as part of the condition of Council action. Staff would remind Council that the underlying intent for such land use rev lews involving boat house structures/guest house units within the 0-75' setback area is to gradually have the structure "deteriorate away". This is why the City must approve all structural repairs of such structures. The building staff has Inspected the structure to determine not only the soundness of the structure, but also to determine what recent repairs have been made to the structure without the benefit of the building permit review. Please review Exhibit P, Bruce Vang's inspection report. Any condition of approval of this structure would require the applicant filing a building permit application for all repairs made to the structure. The report lists both cosmetic and structural type repairs done to the structure within a very recent period of time. The applicant originally advised that there was no plumbing to the structure. Mr. Vang's report notes that there is water but no drains within the structure. Ap»''* leant should advise as to the source of the water.