Laserfiche WebLink
ono Planning Connission n and Ruth Parten .side Hoods Subdivisionsal - Three Lot SubdivisionJool iide^grapJ‘*dJiJiSiy''io*'thrtu?!Iaioin^vide gravel drivevay to Lots 2 and 3. Lot 1 isged to incorporate an alternate septic site as shown.nee Request tl - Lot Areased ^ots 2 and 3 are 4.3 and 4.4 acres respectively, is o.O acres and the proposed road outlet is 2.3reran density of this project is 5.6 acres per <br />property together with.eation of a 50 foot vide road outlet of 2.3 acres <br />»8 a hardship that we feel justifies the granting of a <br />IClB • <br />tee Request #2 - Pavino <br />.ognize that at sone future date the drivevay Outlet <br />access up to six properties and provide access to landlocked parcels. <br />iditional cost of bituminous paving for the 1,250 foot <br />turnaround is approximately $23,000. <br />rmlhl * requirement, those costs should <br />i . parties. Therefore a variance is <br />iveway^*^ naive, for the present time, paving of <br />ate #1 - Two Lot Subdivision <br />ariance for paving is out of the question we propose a <br />t subdivision, shown as "Exhibit A". The additional <br />e of paving the drivevay and turnaround make a three <br />an economically impractical. <br />Ian produces two 5 acre plus parce* •»? variances <br />BQ • <br />Page 2 - Bayside Hoods Subdivision III. Alternate #2 - PRDExhibit B is an attempt to create a PRD as requested by the Planning Commission. The intent of a PRD (as explained by staff) is to cluster home sites in one area of development and leave open space for the enjoyment of the residents, maintaining the overall density of the project at 5 acres or more per residence.The topographic features of the property, potential septic sites, and the natural building sites make clustering of homes unfeasible. The use of open space around building sites when the sites are separated as these are, would infringe on the privacy of the residences and therefore make the lots less marketable. <br />M •