03-12-1990 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

lerly 20' wide section, might be considered a 2, houses and serve as itrict requirement forthat the existing road is "to be released", if the easement holder n has been provided to ing to release his 60'>roperty owners to the access to Bayside Road and they believe they Turnham Road. The City these property owners, e to provide them with ^ to the south suggests le that property with making use of Partens' e that White would want ihort cul-de-sac might 's acreage with its own fide drainage easement i of that ravine could proposal has suggested to development in this 1 be 50* wide, it should ‘ northwest, and should either now or when the by further subdivision ford's property) or by Zoning File #1470 January 10, 1990 Page 5 of 6 recommends a 50' wid% drainage easement over « extreme breadth and depth. Re states thatwnt, 1 ^ miminum width drainage easement that®®®®Ptable. Applicant shows a 15' easement based orthi? f Engineer's input. Remembereasement will not count as buildable Ic* area for this or any future division.*^«c<^ended by the Engineer is a provision to give the City access to the Nature Conservancy parcel via a future right. Apparently the Nature Conservancy has approached the City to transfer its ownership to the City, with covIn^tVwon open space. If this occurs, the Cityaccisi abiltiy to acquire a fu;:ure easement to gainaccess to the property, ^Variances Required - While the 40' outlet does not necessarily present itself as intMt*o/?hl°r!^«.code, it does not strictly meet the if Vll Li ^ ® subdivision st;nH^rds due to the existence property and easement. Lot 2 requires a lack of frontage on a public road. Technlcallv SiJjJ would interpret that neither Lots 1 or 2 require J^iot dth variance, since they both hove mox«^ than 300' of frontage on a private road or private driveway out. ot. Staff Rerrimidation - things considered, the current proposal has merit and solves a nu,L<her of concerns in this neighborhood: 1. Increases the area of the northerly parcel to a conro^ing acreage and provides it access via an outlet to Bayside Road. 2. Provides a dedicated access corridor to the Reiersgord which, if some day granted variances, could possibly be developed as a residential lot. bulid?hi merely make the northerly parcel buildable by increasing its area and providing it with leoal thSt“liJale“?lifj attempting to accomplish of !?? ? purpose, the City is forced to consider 1 minor development as it affects and is potential development of neighboring properties. The not^nec^s"sVr\Yv ‘*«veloper's short-term goals do ^*^® City could potentially place accommodai-i^f^f \ burdens on the developer in attempting to accommodate all future area development concerns.