03-12-1990 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

elops before a future have the opportunity to Reiersgord will not own aln an additional 10* fortlot segment will serve future lot. This segment y a private driveway, not d and utility easement to ler the driveway can be rovided. If not, Lot 1 , or the outlot could be Lre code standards would emergency vehicle turn- ng driveway length.sd now? What part sboald la?: requiring that private Lvisions reach a certain ssltive change in policy, rs. on the subdivision code 4' paving, "more than 7" defined.) Does the poor of the other 2, who will subdivision that should b the 4 unit level, or at f the subdivision code to line rearrangement with d utility easeaent over ? ihould logically ^.^/.e a Lnce it will ultimately t with subdivision code (fote that the recently accessablllty to private easements, would have to ' he so desired, with no Zoning File #1470 January 10, 1990 Page 4 of 6If Outlot A was to exclude the northerly 20* wide section, making that part Outlot B, the 20' strip might be considered a private driveway serving only 1, possibly 2, houses and serve as merely a private driveway without the strict requirement for underlying road and utility easement.The preliminary plat drawings show that the existing easement serving Reiersgord's . j-®.While this would be a logical proposal, if the easement holder agrees to such a release, no information has been provided to suggest that that property owner is willing to release his 60easement.Additional Oiscnsaion -As noted at your last meeting, the property owners to the north have stated that they do not feel an access to Bayslde Road is necessary to serve their properties, and they have legal access across the Luce Line to Turnham Road. The City has no obligation to provide access for these Property owners, and the current applicant does not propose to provide them with access. A brief review of the White property to the south suggests that it might be feasible to subdivide that property with probably no more than - new 5-acre lots making use of Fattens Outlot A. Of course, there is no guarantee that white would wan to develop using Partens' Outlot A. A short cul-de-sac might conceivably be developed to serve White's acreage with its own road system from Bayside Road. The applicants have provided a 15' wide drainage easement over the ravine in Lot 1, since blockage of that ravine could affect drainage of properties to the west. City Engineer's RecfssaMndation - The City Engineer in reviewing this proposal has that under the most comprehensive approach to development in this area, the entire length of Outlot A should be 50’ wide, it ®»oula be extended to serve the properties to the northwest, and should be totally upgraded to a paved standard either now or when the 3rd housing unit is built (which could be by further subdivision of Lot 1 or by construction on Reiersgord's property) or by construction on White’s property.