My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-26-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1990-1996 Microfilm
>
1990
>
02-26-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2024 10:39:24 AM
Creation date
9/6/2024 10:31:34 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
375
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
021:tE:Orono Paries Coimnission IS?e^ 0rdi„.„„3 and ParJ. oed'^arjc Dedication FeoNovember 9, 15 ggCity E5?f"i«rator ^^gineerFor more than is months, the Or= the orono ParhsBased on that stnd. and the rea7on"""'' "® J^soomniend that nev Ord-- - .rm o. .rhjtsTr;::: -i«dum. ^^tached to this <br />■rii“";,'" <br />Bring Orono's Park Dedication r <br />in conformity eirh that of simi7 <br />ties.' oinilar Minnesota <br />" Bnlse the Park Dedication Pee to a 1 . <br />' by other co™m.ities and «“i«ent <br />W for inflation (since it ■ an automaticv^xace it IS tied i-« <br />' ^eing suhdirided,. ^ <br />Bnovide more adequate funding for parks ol <br />=Pen opace as our communitv is suhd - <br />' <iovelopment pressures ' <br />4. Amend the resolution which governs the Park Fund to bring it in conformity with Section 462.358, Subdivision 2b of the Minnesota Statutes by providing that the funds therein can be used to acquire land for "trails or open space", as well as public parks and playgrounds.SUI4MARY OF PARK DEDICATION FEE SCHEDULE IN ORONO AND OTHER COMMUNITIESThe Parks Commission has surveyed the Park Dedication Fee levied in (a) nearby communities and (b) other communities in the metro area which, according to the League of Minnesota Cities, recently have adopted Park Dedication Fee Ordinances. <br />The results of that sxirvey are set forth on Exhibit C. Our <br />conclusions from that sxirvey are: <br />1. Orono's approach of charging a Park Dedication Fee <br />based on a sliding scale depending upon the acreage of the <br />resulting lots (the larger the lot, the smaller the fee) appears <br />to be unusual among the communities surveyed. <br />2. The most common approach appears to assess a Psu:k <br />Dedication Fee equal to a percentage of -the land value, with the <br />percentages varying from 7% to 10%, but the most common <br />percentage being 10%. <br />3. One problem with the current Orono approach is that it <br />fails to adjust for inflation, resulting in the Park Dedication <br />Fee charged by Orono being much lower than that charged by other <br />communities. <br />-
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.