Laserfiche WebLink
0 ' - ^filS;»2ks’ ”“"labusthf <br />4. 1990 3020 <br />of oris <br />Hearing <br />outlet » <br />» - r«ron »«”■’’ court on Outio <br />■=' •» <br />Develope^reliB'i’^*’'^ , n- <br />=f‘f. '°n 0«cT« <br />tennis “or°"t»>« qro“"^f; „»y <br />:;‘cirtr:=t\a.cum», <br />establi?. • \i.„its °n <br />: -b to conaraur ,.,.,o,.r « -eiar. <br />. „ .tail . ‘%-’‘f^r »b^-„*r”e Pi^t^l-* <br />parcel , prov olease r« ^©n. <br />fa^e^^'.Vlf:/ertion”t^« ,oc...c- <br />. tbo ran'c“"'»\rapp’c*^ <br />‘•‘^*'ance," tb« eVtV-'“'i^'ana Structurej-V^ CrtV <br />“‘.'v.r beJer. jot, ffiiifjnllc or prl^^m <br />ua°e. "** <br />v»nicn toace or , open spa <br />restricted by the appropriate easement and which use must be approved by the City at the time of final plat approval. The use of the out lot will thereafter be restricted by the appropriate restricted covenant or open space easement.”Please note an outlet is not defined in the Zoning Chapter. Outlets have been used with PRDs to define shared open space or common recreation areas. It would appear there is nothing in the subdivision regulations what would prohibit the creation of an outlet with a Class III subdivision. There are no area standards for outlets. An outlet is not a residential unit for a single family use. In this case« would Section 10.03, Subdivision 9B be applicable? An Accesory structure requires a principal structure. Is it necessary to grant a variance for an outlet created for a special approved use (Yes/Nc). <br />Section 10.03, Subdivision 9C, Tennis Courts without a roof <br />structure are not considered an oversized accessory structure. <br />The proposed tennis court shall be surrounded by a fence in <br />excess of 6'. <br />Section 10.03, Subdivision 14D, Required Setbacks for Tennis <br />Courts: <br />Front yard: Requlred-50', Proposed-50* <br />Side/rear: Required«30', Proposed»30’ <br />No setback variance will be required for the tennis court <br />structure (60' x 120'). <br />Section 10.03, Subdivision 14C, Lot Coverage Standards - <br />Proposed tennis court shall ‘ijednelosed by a fence in excess of <br />6’ in height. Does this apply to an outlot of less than 1.99 <br />acres in area? <br />Total Area <br />Allowed <br />Proposed <br />27,878 s.f. <br />4,182 s.f. or 151 <br />7,200 s.f. (60* X 120') or 26% <br />Was it the intention of the Planning Commission to make this <br />standard applicable for outlets for special use? If it was the <br />intent of the Planning Commission to include outlets into the lot <br />coverage standard, then a lot coverage variance is required. <br />Option* of Action - <br />Denial - If denied, the following findings nay be <br />applicable: <br />1. Location of tennis court and Impact on existing rural <br />residential neighborhood. <br />2. Depending on reap- <br />noted above, the nee <br />prohibit approval of <br />“^s or findings raised with questions <br />approve multiple variances will <br />mended subdivision.