Resolution 6526 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6526 13. Seven of the eleven lots abut the shore of Mooney Lake and meet the required 200' minimum lot width requirement as measured at the shoreline (established by OHWL 988.0' contour) and at the 100' lakeshore setback line. Proposed Lot 8, Block 1 is not a lakeshore lot and has 59' of frontage on the private road outlot, less than the required 200' frontage and technically requiring a lot width variance. This variance is justified based on the rectangular shape of Lot 8 allowing for a residence meeting all required setbacks, and based on the proposed driveway configuration that allows for tree preservation. Proposed Lot 2, Block 1 is considered as a back lot and will gain access via a 30' driveway outlot, meeting the requirements for back lot access. 14. A stormwater quality (NURP) pond is proposed to be located within Lot 5, Block 1, which will receive a majority of the runoff from the proposed private road. This ponding area will be subject a drainage & utility easement and does not count for dry buildable acreage for Lot 5. All stormwater management shall be subject to MCWD requirements and approvals, and shall provide for appropriate stormwater retention per NPDES regulations. The property will be subject to the Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee for 10 new lots (existing house lot is excluded) at $7,680 per lot for a total fee of $76,800. 15. The Parks, Trails and Open Space element of the Orono Community Management Plan (CMP) has no current plans for parks that specifically require dedication of park land from this property. The CMP does map a potential future trail along Sixth Avenue North but does not indicate whether that trail will be along the north or south side of the road. The Orono Park Commission reviewed the proposed subdivision at its July 6 meeting and recommended that a 10 -foot trail easement be required along the south subdivision boundary. However, the Developer has indicated that such an easement is not feasible at this time because the area that would be encumbered is almost entirely within the two large outlots that are not planned for development with this plat, and the Owner will not authorize the granting of such an easement. Because dedication of land for park purposes is not required at this location, a Park Dedication Fee in lieu of land per City Ordinance would be appropriate. Absent a park land dedication, with 10 new building sites being proposed (11"' is the existing residence), payment of the standard Park Dedication fee for 10 new building lots would be required at the current maximum rate of $5,550 per new lot, for a total fee of $55,500. Draft 7!27/15 MPG Page 5of13