02-12-1990 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

oning File #1473 t^bruary l, 1990 age 5Jditional Comments & Piann^« o, »adlM Co™,s3lo„ Reco«e„d.ti„„ -Exhibit Exhibits -S: 0. *cuo„Ex"J;jbit S : Propos^^£P^^^^^Exhibit o " Sketch^®'"®"*' ApplicantQ - Amended Planommended ^that''Vla^'"®® requested by this deck wnii 1 front line of reefean Previous deck °r/keV 'mmended that with\»f ®®®r, appi icant"s%^?®*^ meeting, op'’rrat:\^o""aVsUZ'=f""'«- -n^d^r hr£ sslve. Mr. Bear anJf i’*."® commission would i." 57.2% of Amended Plan - The amended proDo«:fli cu r\“s''u^^^°"the^e is%^5 “°"® Present ^ Exhibit P ThP^'^o!’^ °f average lakeshorp”°^3%5 ®^*^®nd the revised Jp^i, ^°mmissLn ’s rPonJ ®ftback line, ed propofJi om*; to the origTnll asked«as ag7i®|J ®tili shows the deck at thp The •ant propose*? p ^®*^ommendation of the pipnnT^^^^ setback, setback'^ aria (" 1 e?s‘e°"r“' "^iSPover w"®thi?"A'^‘,°"-ape areas with u^nrio^i • review Exhibits c n? dcover i«? lying plastic totpii. M). 5 and bitt^i^^Sf^a-iW/ - w^Yb"rdVr•l ;• Zoning Pile #1473 February 7, 1990 Page 6Although applicant has proposed an agreement to limit any further intensification of the current deck as proposed in the amended plan, the City's own ordinances would require a variance approval if the subject deck was to be enclosed. If a deck is to be approved by Council, the resolution approving the structure would fore.iarn any property owner that the deck structure could not be intensified without the appropriate approvals of the City.Options of Action Available to Council -1. Denial finding that applicant has not demon' rated sufficient hardship to allow for more permanent structural hardcover within an area already containing excessive amounts of hardcover, and to require the immediate removal of the structure; or2. Approval asking for the following reconstruction of the current deck structure: Per applicant's proposal, remove structure within the 0-75' setback area, but also require removal of that portion of the deck that encroaches the side yard setback area, and approve 75-250' hardcover at 47,1%. Council would be approving a 16' encroachment of the average setback line; or Per Planning Commission recommendation, hold applicant to the 14'width requiring a 2'+ average lakeshore set back line encroachment and approving no side setback variances. Council may consider allowing 989 s.f. area of current deck to be reconfigured within the 10' side setbacks and the 14' extension from the front line of the existing residence. Prior to Council acting on such a proposal, applicant would have to submit a revised plan showing the reconfigured deck. Council must also approve applicant's proposal to reduce hardcover in the 75-250' setback area to a 47,1% or request additional removals either in the 75-250' or 250-500' setback u-eas. Council Action - To provide staff with conceptual direction so that an appropriate resolution can be prepared for Council's action at the February 26, 1990 meeting.