02-12-1990 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

<-he’ -V wish \o’’e«ne *■"Planning C®”''"/itcan" «"hh ^^®o°'’eic”o»chment °£Lon p"o-«ls” !ertovri»£r u:h^r;i-a “rit-',V us?“«fhhin'ts;-»«i-250' 8®^^* 4.hts property?\Tlsr‘wp££«*^°"’" £ or .48 acresIvious sleilah 21.£1 ’.UV »*•«-. ot the property r propertytal a’^®* ?e 23»560 s.f*fc^Tirement). current °z*oni°g can find that Rations of the J^rof tVi of the CiJ;X'cas>"?rorehenslve PlhJV X£ vou can Untsiior-e nnh^^cft-^a"C t r"X the Citys acj^iaslon member ions, than ^^an £(.,tion. liable to ■•of the proposea app aval lahie y the oniyJ^«lf “e?ttn the City '’oning File #1473 Ffeoruary 7, 1990 Page 5Additional Comments & Planning Commission Recommendation - List of Additional Exhibits -Exhibit K Exhibit L Exhibit M Exhibit n Exhibit 0 Exhibit P Exhibit Q Planning Coirmission Notice of ActionBear Correspondence 2/5/90Hardcover Fact Sheet 75-250' Setback AreaConsents of Adjacent NeighborsProposed Agreement by ApplicantStaff SketchAmended PlanThe Planning Commission denied all variances requested by applicant for current illegal deck. Planning Commission recommended that applicant be allowed to reconstruct a deck that would extend no closer to the lakeshore than the previous deck (extend 14’ in front of front line of residence). Review Exhibit P, this deck would encroach no more than approximately 2+' beyond the average lakeshore setback line. In addition, the revised deck could not extend into the required 10' side setback yard and held hardcover at the present 57.2% level. Since that meeting, staff has spoken with Stuart Bear, applicant's attorney, and recommended that with the revised plan realigning the lakeshore deck per Planning Commission's directives, that it would be appropriate to also show reductions in existing hardcover, within the 75-2 50' zone. Mr. Bear was advised that the 57.2% recommended by the Planning Commission would be found too excessive. Mr. Bear agreed to discuss my recommendation with his client and has submitted an amended plan for Council's review and consideration (review Exhibit Q). Review of Amended Plan - The amended proposal shows the deck at the present configuration with the portions within the 0-75' being removed. As a result, there is no longer any hardcover within the 0-75' setback area. The current deck as amended would extend approximately 16' in front of the average lakeshore setback line. Review Exhibit P, The Planning Commission's recommendation asked that the revised deck hold to the original setback line. The revised proposal still shows the deck at the 9' side setback, which was against the recommendation of the Planning Commission. Applicant proposes a reduction of 10.1% hardcover within the 75- 250' setback area (please review Exhibits G, H2 and M). Landscape areas with underlying plastic totally some 1,681 s.f. of hardcover is to be removed. Applicant shows no reductions within the 250-500' setback area, now at 64.77% hardcover. The majority of that hardcover is landscape areas with underlying plastic and bituminous paving.