My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-12-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
02-12-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/23/2024 1:31:11 PM
Creation date
8/23/2024 1:21:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
422
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Instead of putting in a new pipe by digging a trenchant and the second the agricultural run-off in the Phe Maple Plain plant contribution has been removedDistrict has put a settling basin the Painter s Creek area should help improve the Removal of the treatment plants around the lake haslake.) As for this local )st of It IS an area of natural growth with the only Jing drainage off County Road 19, Highwood Road and <br />Sauer property. (A detention <br />ipally for storm water temporary storage and is what <br />'proposed. Detention refers to water being held for <br />is eventually drained off with retention <br />tnat there is always water in at least part of the <br />n. Retention areas are generally associated with <br />mprove water quality.) <br />done^^ water quality coming out of this pipe <br />I r raised regarding thehat the back part of the current Sauer property was <br />^ned by the City. This is not the case, as best the <br />from Its records. The City is unsure the extent to <br />li' have been a wetlands at some point in the past. <br />lould be aware of the fact that although proposed as <br />here are two facets to it. The first is handling <br />storm water ponding basin as it presently exists <br />Of the water quantity. The second aspect is <br />i water quantity problem as it relates to Highwood <br />and water draining off Highwood to the properties <br />;o the east of Highwood. The project as proposed <br />e the street in order to direct the storm water away <br />ges and properties and down to use the same storm <br />The first phase, that being controllinq the <br />J water in the watershed can be done independently <br />, but not vise versa as redirecting the flow from <br />US basin without making the necessary improvements <br />ould only exacerbate the existing problem. <br />I - It is recommended that the Council undertake a <br />his problem which would be Option I, a 21" pipe on <br />J <br />the City public right-of-way to be financed through special assessments. It is recommended the street regrading not be undertaken as there ia apparently little indication as to this being a severe problem. This could be done at a later date independently of the first phase. (All costs are Independent of any easement costs.)PORPOSED MOTION - Moved by seconded by _, that the Councilorder the project be undertaken and that the necessary design diagrams be drawn up by the Engineer for bidding. Additionally staff is directed to undertake financing of the project through special assessments. In order for the Council to actually order the project be undertaken, once the bids are received will require 4/5's vote on the part of the Council. Ayes _, Nays _.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.