01-22-1990 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

„„ council Members “CnT°" ^aministreborxy 21’<S.Lnne •aaras ior oriveweyB’ “iteria/S«a“'»a''^ ivate)va\ic #staff*** 0 1989 meeting priv^a^^^2;‘.*nffi isir. *.”|,a“toSawMs. „ ' 1 *”“'l!Syr»na®‘s\cbion e review Exhibit J,*^enb V,\" icbbb bhe «^Tl, '^a: ?he Transportatxo expaasio*" o^E P . b“rr.b «et{°‘ Tsoi^nft f«ve^envelopment ab^^hiV ur* S°iilopm°ents « ?'::rei4!7|arefo^prnt^, 'ortbVWt^.pb-/,'^ SS .Tra" -HfeVeaa^^^-a« -^wtu IP. Pi Criteria/Standards for Driveways, Roadways (Public & Private)Page 2 of 4Subdivision Regulations -Please review Exhibit B, Pages 1 through 7, sections of the subdivision chapter that governs driveways and roadways, both public and private. Per Section B (2), private roads are reguired at the level of 3 residences. This is in conflict with the Comprehensive Management Plan section that states "in rural areas up to a 3 user level, a private driveway may still be approved". Review Section 11.32, Subdivision 2 (B) - "Permanent cul-de-sac design roads are to be discouraged", another conflict with CMP. The subdivision regulations ask that roadways extend to the boundary lines of the property for the purpose of coordinating future subdivisions with adjacent^ properties. Permanent cul-de-sac roads would only be allowed if there were certain physical conditions preventing a through road or if in the opinion of the City, the extension was not necessary per future road grid system. Review Section 11.32r Subdivision 1 (H) on Page B-6 of your attached exhibits. This section would support the previous section in regard to through road configurations being preferred. A through road may be actually constructed or approved with a temporary cul-de-sac with a road outlet permitted to the edge of the property for future connection. Please review the suggested standards in the subdivision regulations for road construction, both private and public (Exhibit B-7). Per the table in the subdivision regulations, a private road may serve over 7 units. The Comprehensive Plan recommends that any road that serves 10 or more units is at a level requiring public maintenance. Right-of-way widths are shown at 50 feet. The Comprehensive Plan has specified 30 to 50 feet for private roads. Under public streets, the right-of-way width is shown at 50 feet. The Comprehensive Plan refers to 50 to 60 feet widths. Cul-de-sacs are specifically limited to 1,000 feet for public roadways with a maximum number of 10 units.- Corrent Practice/Policy of City - In the past 10 years, the only streets accepted as public roads and for maintenance have been Dickey Lake Drive, a 13-lot rural residential subdivision and the extensions of Livingston and Lyric Avenues in Navarre (Navarro plat). Countryside Drive, a rural subdivision, is also a dedicated roadway and will be maintained by the City as soon as it is a connecting through road with Old Crystal^ Bay Road. Based on current code sections and A. CMP policies. Holly Acres wbuld qualify as public road with a through road configurati^i—and with an excess of 10 units. Based on the directives of the CMP, Planned Residential Developments with more than 10 units such as Hunt Farm, French Creek, Painters Woods, and Sugar Woods may qualify for a private or public road classification. The recent 13 lot Meyer's Dairy (Hilbelink/Vogt) plat provided for a future through road (undeveloped outlets) connection to Woodhaven Drive and to Golden View Drive to the south but the road retained a private road classification. %