Laserfiche WebLink
UKONO COONCIL MEETING 13 /I;CTED PR0PEHT7 COVENANT CHURCH P-=ert,ce 1979. The Cit^v ^ "tax forfeit"1987/1988 the City had a partv^nt® public^"f/^riances'^were granJJd PurchasingShortly after the variances wi?e arL?^^"^5t to go forward with the nnr-r-h^ 9^anted, the party City to designate this %aroe? ’'‘’® has-epTn''county* cl/AnV/y 'ka^a' th'’* “rlnd° hCoTOission to se» wh«h.“ tV P'’®ioT P-P--da1ron*k “councTri:?nh^J^fe^Jfrko htiT/d"ge°-;h:2%h^e^^^"‘-^ —nt)n other property. Me said rha#. i. *a t®®t®®tion area <br />■s® the ability to use the lax ’’?orf*eit “rroprrtr ‘ <br />ber Go'ltten^‘^Vo" ref eJ° this seconded by <br />of the request a^nVt^ <br />Motxon, Ayes=4, Nays=0,Vt?on pissed <br />SWER <br />currentl^ Planning and <br />septic systems on Cygnet Pilled Problems <br />replied that to the best- k,* t <br />'Stems currently, but replacem^nl"°'^^®'^^® there were <br />-hll ale- <br />' ^nc"lu\?oi/%“*/usL\" o? “ ?t“;in° ^rta- =i„= 'the 's\tel <br />mber Goetten asked about Oxf^y-ri n j <br />t3 the lakeshore. Goetten hoii* Poad and the need <br />:he lakeshore is a va“ld rUso^t <=» <br />Goetten also believed Jhi.J c s«''er property <br />be study. Goe«erqueJSlL./t®K ’‘ =>’°"W bl <br />-bd the comprehensive Plan"*/f “tVVVVVk'VlSrwVrl <br />rehensiV'e^ pfan f“r pol^tial^VelV/. i<S®"tlfled <br />fff. <br />% > <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO COONCIL MEETING OP NOVEMBER 13, 1989 STUBBS BAY SEWER CONTINUEDCounciImember Goetten indicated that should any retoning be done, the City should rezone all of the 2-acre zoning areas which have recently been sewered.Goetten also questioned whether the Comprehensive Plan was due to be reviewed for 1990.Bernhardson replied that he would look into that matter further and report back.Planning Commission Representative Bellows did not believe it would be beneficial to rezone lakeshore property for the purpose of sewering lakeshore property.Bernhardson said that issue was brought forth by the lakeshore residents.Councilmember Peterson concurred with Bellows and Goetten <br />that rezcning around the lake would be unwise. Peterson asked <br />whether the Planning Commission would be invited to the upcoming <br />meeting regarding Stubbs Bay sewer. <br />Councilmember Goetten asked City Attorney Barrett if the <br />City could legally ask residents to sign a waiver of appeal? <br />Barrett replied that the City could p.roceed in such a <br />manner. <br />Acting Mayor Callahan believed that the next step for the <br />City is to have another meeting and suggested bringing this <br />matter back in December for consideration of a meeting date. <br />It was moved by Acting Mayor Callahan, seconded by <br />Councilmember Nettles, to bring this matter back for <br />consideration at the December 11, 1989 Council meeting. Motion, <br />Ayes»4, Nays=0, Motion passed. <br />WEST HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES PLANNING BOARD <br />RESOLUTION #2730 ^Councilmember Goetten asked whether support from the Cities <br />.would be indicated in the form of a letter to Hennepin County? <br />Bernhardson said that there was a draft resolution included <br />in the packets of information that, if adopted, would be sent to <br />Hennepin County. <br />Councilmember Goetten indicated that she would like to urge <br />the Council to send a letter to the County in addition to a <br />resolution. <br />Bernhardson said that he could send both a letter and a copy <br />of the resolution. <br />It was moved by Councilmember Nettles, seconded by <br />8