My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-22-1990 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1990
>
01-22-1990 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/10/2024 2:16:42 PM
Creation date
8/16/2024 10:59:50 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
716
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
“eaTTavl been'^ " * "“"iber of -e „oUa„.„ther homeowner they <3esire to P^^vate‘llty Of a'"'"“«ed “ould ha,e a?®‘. "°t a^cant factor in Point % Vh Our ina,^/®®^®*^’*• " A‘pran„?'«°"3 °wo^/d’'Va*, ««eta"Srp'o^‘'?* =°unc°i“f' »^aVf baVi\r -^»or,a^„'d°e-£ ip° -'If-‘"oae standards! ^PPro,/„,Jff, «« „oul‘d^$20,200^r .-if-v*»k MI'irrA'3J /Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members Mark E. Bernhardson, City Administrato^V^^October 16» 1989'Subject: Extension of Private or Public RoadAttadnent - , , , «A - Public/Private Roads Memo dated 8/21/89 B - Map of AreaIssue -In relation to an upcoming subdivision determine the level of Council interest to utilize City powers to extend a private road to serve a plat further north. <br />Introduction - <br />Attachment A was transmitted to Council at a time when a <br />subdivision was being reviewed at the Planning Commission and <br />expected to go to the Council. There was no discussion on the <br />matter at the time. The person doing the subdividing has now <br />acquired additional property from the original owner and will be <br />submitting a modified subdivision to the November 20, <br />Planning Commission meeting. Access to this property can either <br />be by an east/west corridor-driveway or a private road outlet to <br />the south. Efforts have been made to limit curb cuts on Old <br />Crystal Bay Road. Directing traffic down to Watertown Road via a <br />street to the rear would be the preferable approach. <br />Discussion - <br />Currently Wear Lane to the south of this property is a cul- <br />de-sac private road over which the City has a road and utility <br />easement. Last year the subdivider approached the original <br />developer of these lots and was quoted a price of $20,000 per lot <br />for access over ‘the private road* (Subsequent to that 3 of the 6 <br />lots on the property have been sold to other parties. They may <br />be more willing to agree to the extension in order to have more <br />people share the coat of maintenance.) As noted in tne <br />attorney's opinion of Attachment A, the City does have some <br />alternatives to be exercised in relation to this extension if <br />that is the direction it desires to go. <br />Alternatives - <br />1. Direct the subdivider to work with the members of the <br />Homeowners' Association to see if an extension is agreeable. <br />2. Allow a person to extend the private road onto their <br />from the existing cul-de-sac and allow passage overproperty f: <br />it through the following:
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.