My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-09-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
12-09-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2024 2:02:02 PM
Creation date
7/29/2024 1:59:22 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
286
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
fk <br />K'* <br />>v <br />.( <br />K:. <br />&•■ <br />^•: * *- <br />;• <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 28• 1B91 <br />#1691 - CONT. <br />Habusth explained there Is an outlet proposed for a future road <br />to the railroad track to serve properties on the north side of <br />the railroad# for potential development of 16 to 50 units. <br />Butler noted the plat does not specify which area Is considered <br />future roadway. <br />Habusth noted the road will be platted through <br />Easements will need to be acquired from the <br />completion of the roadway. <br />the exception. <br />MWee to allow <br />Butler questioned whether the owner of Lot 12 may loose <br />bulldable land to provide an easement for the roadway If <br />cannot be obtained from the MWCC. <br />dry <br />one <br />Roos noted the citing of the exception was mandated by the <br />location of the underpass. He noted there Is no possibility of <br />moving the roadway further eastward. He stated that they haven't <br />decided whether to deal with the MWCC as a part of this plat. <br />Roos noted that Wolf's property Is marginal for development. <br />Jabbour was uncomfortable ti.at this Issue needed to be resolved <br />quickly# which Is now Including access to the Wolf property. He <br />understood that no other development would ever exit onto this <br />road. <br />Roos reiterated that It Is a marginal developable property, but <br />because It does have a zoning district# they provided access for <br />a possibility of future development. <br />Jabbour stated he wanted to make It clear that Orono does not <br />want any additional traffic other than from this subdivision to <br />access onto Orono Orchard Road. <br />Roos understood the Council's position# but noted because of the <br />underpass# felt It should be retained as an outlet as <br />historically there was some type of access to the Wolf property. <br />Jabbour noted that historically the property being developed was <br />In Orono. <br />Barrett Injected that another limiting factor may be that the <br />underpass Is not fully constructed or would need extensive work <br />and could be very expensive. <br />Habusth noted It Is the same size as the underpass to Watertown <br />Road. <br />Callahan noted he Is not In favor of providing access for the <br />Wolf property through Orono# <br />■any times during negotiation. <br />and he recalled this was covered <br />i:, . <br />tti * - •
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.