Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />LMCD Board of Directors Octol)or 23, 1991 <br />two <br />or 4 <br />2) All shared or combined residential d-.".'ks of <br />restricted watercraft at no fee, shared docks v;ith 3 <br />restricted watercraft to be registered at one SIO fee. <br />Slocum said he supports the need for the information but <br />asked that the $10 fee be eliminated. He feels we are a.sking for <br />information to identil rentals and other data, and then chaining <br />for it. Grathwol suggested a sunset provision or charging a <br />higher fee for one year and then charging a fee onl.v v/hen there <br />is a change. Carlson expressed concern ab'.'ut any .additional fees <br />to property owners, and to look at what it will cost to <br />administer. <br />Doswinkel suggested a letter be writtetj to thos*^ with over <br />two boats, asking that they comply as required. <br />Qrathwol responded that this is an att-iMiipt to Ijring l..>gether <br />information in response to complaints ab'.>ut rental <■.•1 d<;'Ck3 to <br />non-residents. Support from the great mas.-.e.? ot per-sons on the <br />Lake will be needed to make it successful. <br />Foster expressed concern abo'.it adding anotlier layer of <br />registration requiring another form. He favors preventing rental <br />of docks without a license because it Ls .^pp.arent from <br />advertit»ements in the papers that it is being done. He believes <br />LMCD does not have the staff, pov/er or <br />done on this issue. Foster believe.s <br />Thibault indicates an infinitesimally <br />four boat storage docks. among the k <br />Lake. The executive director stated a <br />shows there with 187 docks with three, four or more boats out of <br />an estimated 2.000 docks on the Lake. The staff receives five <br />or six complaints per season about use of docks hy otlier tljon tlje <br />resident, all of whicli have been .tcteil upon. The ci.'ncern is that <br />as this storage increases, especially with tlie return of normal <br />water levels, it increases the potential growtli o£ the Lake use. <br />Grathwol added that the expiratioti of the moi-atorium on tlie <br />building of multiple docks will result in iii':'re applications for <br />multiple docks. Reese mentioned the District’s indication to <br />marina owners that something would be done about the private <br />rental of slips. Babcock does not see tliat this study addresses <br />boat rental. <br />Grathwol moved, Foster seconded, to refer the study back to <br />the subcommittee. Motion carried. Markus, Heese, Owen and <br />Pillsbur/ voting nay. <br />whatever t<.-> get the Job <br />the inventory done by <br />small number three and <br />(Jf.iU boats stored on the <br />1991 phy.sicai inventory <br />D. Code Amendment Regarding High Density Lights <br />le first readingGrathwol moved, Reese seconded, to approve t <br />of a code amendment to Secti<;>n 2.0.3, addinp dock license <br />requirements for lakeshore sites utilising high iiitensity lights. <br />Slocum noted this amendment do.als with liglttp on docks. not <br />on shore. He believes It should go back to the ejunmittee. <br />responded that this is the first reading and if there <br />concerns. the concerns could be discussed at the committee <br />the cities could be asked for comment. <br />Babcock spoke in favox* of the proposed ordinince. <br />Hurr <br />are <br />and